MathLabs

Problem 5

Consider an infinite sequence a1,a2,…a_1,a_2,\ldots of positive integers such that 100!(am+am+1+⋯+an)100!(a_m+a_{m+1}+\cdots+a_n) is a multiple of an−m+1an+ma_{n-m+1}a_{n+m} for all positive integers m,nm,n with m≤nm\le n. Prove that the sequence is either bounded or linear. A sequence is bounded if there is a constant NN such that an<Na_n<N for every positive integer nn, and it is linear if an=n⋅a1a_n=n\cdot a_1 for every positive integer nn.
Step 10 of 10: The persistent prime contradicts the normalization
an∣c(an+k−ak),an+k∣c(an+ak)⟹p∣ak∀ka_n\mid c(a_{n+k}-a_k),\quad a_{n+k}\mid c(a_n+a_k)\Longrightarrow p\mid a_k\quad\forall k
Detailed analysis

Fix any kk. Since an∣c(an+k−ak)a_n\mid c(a_{n+k}-a_k) by Step 1, unboundedness lets us choose nn so large that ana_n and an+ka_{n+k} are at least ara_r (for sufficiently large choices, positivity forces the difference to be positive; indeed an+k≥an/c−aka_{n+k}\ge a_n/c-a_k). Hence both are divisible by pe′p^{e'}. The other relation in Step 1, an+k∣c(an+ak)a_{n+k}\mid c(a_n+a_k), and e′>vp(c)e'>v_p(c) now imply p∣akp\mid a_k. Since kk was arbitrary, pp divides every term, contradicting the normalization gcd⁡(a1,a2,…)=1\gcd(a_1,a_2,\ldots)=1. Therefore the sequence is bounded in this case.