MathLabs

Problem 3

Let P=A1A2⋯AkP=A_1A_2\cdots A_k be a convex polygon in the plane. The vertices A1,A2,…,AkA_1,A_2,\dots,A_k have integer coordinates and lie on a circle. Let SS be the area of PP. An odd positive integer nn is given such that the square of the length of each side of PP is an integer divisible by nn. Prove that 2S2S is an integer divisible by nn.
Step 5 of 5: Conclusion by minimal counterexample and combining prime powers
In plain words

The contradiction rules out any minimal counterexample beyond the settled triangle case, so induction closes the gap up to the original polygon.

no counterexample exists ⇒ n=pe∣2S ⇒ n∣2S for general odd n\text{no counterexample exists}\ \Rightarrow\ n=p^e\mid 2S\ \Rightarrow\ n\mid2S\ \text{for general odd } n
Detailed analysis

The contradiction of the previous step shows no minimal counterexample with k≥3k\ge3 vertices beyond the triangle case can exist: either a diagonal itself has pep^e dividing its squared length (in which case induct on the two smaller cyclic sub-polygons it creates, each with strictly fewer vertices, both already known to satisfy the divisibility, and 2S2S for the whole polygon is the sum of 2S2S for the two pieces), or no such diagonal exists and the valuation argument of the previous step gives a contradiction. By strong induction starting from the triangle base case (Step 1), every convex cyclic lattice polygon with all squared side lengths divisible by pep^e has pe∣2Sp^e\mid2S. Since nn (odd) is a product of such prime powers pep^e and the corresponding divisibility of 2S2S by each prime power combines (as 2S2S is a single fixed integer) into divisibility by their product nn, we conclude n∣2Sn\mid2S.