In plain wordsThe locus of points whose power with respect to two fixed circles has a constant ratio is itself a circle, and A, A1, A2 all satisfy the same ratio condition, so that locus must be exactly the circle named in the problem.
Let the line AA1 meet ωb again at X and ωc again at Y, and use directed ratios ka=AYAX. The circles ωb,ωc are distinct and share A1,A2, so they are not concentric. The coaxiality lemma says that the locus La:Pow(P,ωb)=kaPow(P,ωc) is a circle when ka=1, and is a line when ka=1. Here A1,A2∈La because both powers are zero, while on AA1 the secant-power theorem gives Pow(A,ωb)=AX⋅AA1 and Pow(A,ωc)=AY⋅AA1, so A∈La by the definition of ka. The points A,A1,A2 are noncollinear, hence La cannot be a line; thus ka=1 and La is exactly Ca=(AA1A2). The directed-angle chase in the two auxiliary circles gives ∠XAB1=30∘−β, ∠A1XB1=30∘+γ, and, similarly, ∠YAC1=30∘−γ, ∠A1YC1=30∘+β. Applying the sine rule in △AB1X and △AC1Y therefore yields AB1AX=sin(30∘+γ)sin(β+γ) and AC1AY=sin(30∘+β)sin(β+γ). These are the required directed-angle calculations, not an appeal to an unlabeled diagram. Define Cb,Cc and kb,kc cyclically.