MathLabs

Problem 6

Consider a 2025×20252025\times2025 grid of unit squares. Matilda wishes to place on the grid some rectangular tiles, possibly of different sizes, such that each side of every tile lies on a grid line and every unit square is covered by at most one tile. Determine the minimum number of tiles Matilda needs to place so that each row and each column of the grid has exactly one unit square that is not covered by any tile.
Step 5 of 6: Each tile carries at most one letter, giving the bound
#tiles ≥ C−4 ≥ n+a+b−4 ≥ n+2ab−4 ≥ n+2n−4 (or −3 if LIS, LDS meet)\#\text{tiles}\ \ge\ C-4\ \ge\ n+a+b-4\ \ge\ n+2\sqrt{ab}-4\ \ge\ n+2\sqrt n-4\ (\text{or }-3\text{ if LIS, LDS meet})
Detailed analysis

The key geometric fact is that no tile can receive mappings from two distinct black cells. Indeed, a tile is an axis-parallel rectangle. If two mapped cells used the same direction, the rectangle would contain the whole axis-parallel strip between their two side-adjacencies; the corresponding broken path through consecutive cells of CC or AA crosses that strip, so the rectangle would either cover a black cell or cross a path boundary, both impossible. If the two directions are different, the two relevant path arcs meet only at cc; rectangle convexity again forces the tile across that crossing, and the only possible common source is the single cell cc itself. Thus all mappings from distinct black cells point to distinct tiles. There are n−4n-4 successful first mappings: exactly one can fail at each of the first row, last row, first column, and last column. Every cell of (A∪C)∖{c}(A\cup C)\setminus\{c\} supplies one additional successful direction, giving a+b−2a+b-2 more mappings, while cc supplies three additional directions. Consequently the covering has at least (n−4)+(a+b−2)+3=n+a+b−3(n-4)+(a+b-2)+3=n+a+b-3 tiles. From ab≥nab\ge n and AM-GM, a+b≥2ab≥2n=2ka+b\ge2\sqrt{ab}\ge2\sqrt n=2k, so the number of tiles is at least n+2k−3n+2k-3. For n=2025=452n=2025=45^2, this lower bound is 2025+90−3=21122025+90-3=2112, matching the explicit construction.