Grade 10
Inequalities
Statements comparing two expressions with <, ≤, > or ≥, including classical bounds like AM–GM.
IntuitionComparing Sizes Without Computing Exactly
Not every mathematical question asks "what is the exact value?" — often we only need to know which of two quantities is larger, or that one never exceeds the other. The symbols , , , record exactly this kind of comparison: for instance is obviously true, and holds no matter what real value we substitute. Inequalities let us reason about an entire family of numbers at once — exactly what is needed to bound a measurement error, optimize the shape of a container, or guarantee that an algorithm never runs too slowly.
SchoolRules for Manipulating Inequalities
Definition: Order relations
For real numbers and , we write when is positive, and when is nonnegative; and are defined symmetrically. An inequality is strict if it uses or , and non-strict if it uses or .
Adding the same number to both sides never changes the direction of an inequality: . Multiplying by a positive number also preserves the direction, , but multiplying by a negative number reverses it, — this sign flip is the single most common source of errors when solving inequalities.
| Operation | Result |
|---|---|
| Add (any real) | Direction unchanged: |
| Multiply by | Direction unchanged: |
| Multiply by | Direction reverses: |
| Square, if | Direction unchanged: |
UndergraduateTwo Classical Inequalities
For all real numbers and , , with equality exactly when .
Why is it true?
The arithmetic mean treats "spread out" numbers gently, while the geometric mean punishes spread: multiplying two very different numbers gives a smaller "typical size" than adding and halving them.
Proof
Start from a fact that is always true: any real square is nonnegative. Apply this to , which is a real number since : .
Expand the square using with , : this gives , i.e. .
Rearrange by adding to both sides and then dividing everything by (a positive number, so the direction is preserved): , which is exactly .
Equality holds throughout only when the very first step was equality, i.e. , which happens exactly when , i.e. .
For all real numbers and , , where denotes absolute value; equality holds exactly when and have the same sign (or one is ).
Why is it true?
Absolute value measures distance from zero; adding two numbers of opposite sign causes cancellation, so the distance of the sum can only shrink compared to adding the distances separately.
Proof
Every real number satisfies by definition of absolute value. Apply this to both and : and .
Add the two chains of inequalities term by term (allowed since adding preserves direction): .
The statement for is exactly equivalent to by definition of absolute value; here and , so , which is .
Equality requires both chained inequalities to be equalities simultaneously, which forces and to have the same sign (both nonnegative or both nonpositive), since only then does no cancellation occur between and .
UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples
Inequalities are the everyday tool of engineers and scientists who never need an exact answer, only a guaranteed bound: a bridge must hold at least a given load, a signal-to-noise ratio must exceed a threshold, a budget must not exceed a cap. The AM–GM inequality in particular turns "what is the best possible shape or allocation?" into pure algebra, because a sum-with-fixed-product or product-with-fixed-sum problem is exactly what controls.
Example: Maximizing the area of a fenced garden
A gardener has meters of fencing to enclose a rectangular garden of width and length , so . What is the largest possible area , and for which is it achieved?
Solution
From we get . We want to maximize subject to this fixed sum.
By the AM–GM inequality, applied to gives , so , hence .
Equality in AM–GM holds exactly when , so — a square garden — achieves the bound, giving .
Any other split, e.g. , gives only , confirming the square is optimal.
Example: Bounding total GPS position error
A GPS receiver combines a horizontal error of meters from atmospheric delay with a further error of meters from clock drift (a negative value here means it partially cancels the first error). Use the triangle inequality to give a guaranteed upper bound on the size of the combined error without needing to know the exact sign relationship in general.
Solution
The triangle inequality holds for all real , regardless of sign, so it applies here even though we suspect partial cancellation.
Compute the right-hand side using the actual values: meters. This is the guaranteed worst-case bound: meters, valid even if we did not know the signs of in advance (which is the realistic situation for a receiver designer bounding errors before a specific reading comes in).
In this particular numeric case we can also compute exactly: , so meter, comfortably inside the bound of meters — illustrating that the triangle inequality bound is a safe worst case, not always tight, which is exactly what a guaranteed engineering bound should be.
The gap between the bound ( m) and the actual value ( m) here reflects that and have opposite signs; the bound would be tight (equal to ) only if both errors pointed the same direction.
For and , what are the arithmetic mean and geometric mean ?
Solve the inequality for .
A gardener has meters of fencing () for a rectangular garden of area . What is the maximum possible area?
If and , which of the following is always true?