MathLabs

Algebra

Lie groups and Lie algebras

Continuous symmetry groups GG and their linearized versions g\mathfrak{g} = TeGT_e G, central to modern geometry and physics.

IntuitionRotations that vary smoothly

A Lie group is a group that is also a smooth manifold, so multiplication and inversion are smooth maps. The rotation group SO(3)SO(3) of R3\mathbb{R}^3 is the flagship example: it is a curved 33-dimensional surface sitting inside n×nn \times n matrices, yet each rotation composes smoothly with the next. Because SO(3)SO(3) is curved, we cannot add two rotations directly — but we can look at the space of velocity vectors of paths through the identity rotation II. That space is a flat vector space called the Lie algebra so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3), and it captures the "infinitesimal" structure of SO(3)SO(3) near the identity. The widget below lets you rotate a frame about an axis by angle θ\theta using Rz(θ)R_z(\theta), tracing the one-parameter family etXe^{tX} generated by a single element X∈gX \in \mathfrak{g}.

Point rotating on the unit circle by angle theta, illustrating a one-parameter subgroup.
The point on the circle traces etXe^{tX} for the generator of rotation in the plane — the simplest 11-dimensional Lie group U(1)U(1), a warm-up for SO(3)SO(3).

SchoolFrom matrices to the tangent space

Definition: Matrix Lie group and its Lie algebra

SO(3)SO(3) is defined as SO(3)={A∈R3×3∣ATA=I, det⁡A=1}SO(3) = \{ A \in \mathbb{R}^{3\times 3} \mid A^T A = I,\ \det A = 1 \} placed in words: orthogonal matrices of determinant 11. Its Lie algebra TeGT_e G consists of every velocity vector of a smooth curve γ(t)∈SO(3)\gamma(t) \in SO(3) with γ(0)=I\gamma(0) = I; concretely,

SO(3)={A∈R3×3∣ATA=I, det⁡A=1}SO(3) = \{ A \in \mathbb{R}^{3\times 3} \mid A^T A = I,\ \det A = 1 \}

Differentiating γ(t)Tγ(t)=I\gamma(t)^T \gamma(t) = I at t=0t=0 gives γ′(0)T+γ′(0)=0\gamma'(0)^T + \gamma'(0) = 0, i.e. every tangent vector X=γ′(0)X = \gamma'(0) is skew-symmetric: XT=−XX^T = -X. This gives the tangent space explicitly as

so(3)={X∈R3×3∣XT=−X}\mathfrak{so}(3) = \{ X \in \mathbb{R}^{3\times 3} \mid X^T = -X \}
Comparing the group and its Lie algebra
ObjectStructureOperationDimension
SO(3)SO(3) (group)curved manifoldmatrix product33
so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) (algebra)flat vector spaceLie bracket [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y] = XY - YX33

UndergraduateThe tangent space is closed under the bracket

Let GG be a matrix Lie group with Lie algebra g\mathfrak{g} = TeGT_e G. For all X∈gX \in \mathfrak{g}, Y∈gY \in \mathfrak{g}, the matrix bracket [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y] = XY - YX again lies in g\mathfrak{g}. In particular g\mathfrak{g} is closed under [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y] = XY - YX, and this bracket satisfies the Jacobi identity [X,[Y,Z]]+[Y,[Z,X]]+[Z,[X,Y]]=0[X,[Y,Z]] + [Y,[Z,X]] + [Z,[X,Y]] = 0, so g\mathfrak{g} is a genuine Lie algebra.

Why is it true?

Group multiplication is nonlinear, so we cannot simply add two group elements. But the bracket [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y] = XY - YX measures the *failure of GG to be commutative* to second order, and remarkably that failure is itself linear — it lives in the tangent space. This is what lets us replace hard nonlinear questions about GG (does it commute? what are its subgroups?) with linear-algebra questions about g\mathfrak{g} (does the bracket vanish? what are its ideals?), which is exactly why Lie theory is so powerful.

Proof

Step 1 (setup). Let X∈gX \in \mathfrak{g}, Y∈gY \in \mathfrak{g} come from curves α(t),β(t)∈G\alpha(t), \beta(t) \in G with α(0)=β(0)=I\alpha(0)=\beta(0)=I, α′(0)=X\alpha'(0)=X, β′(0)=Y\beta'(0)=Y; to first order α(t)≈I+tX\alpha(t) \approx I + tX and β(t)≈I+tY\beta(t) \approx I + tY.

Step 2 (the commutator curve). Define γ(t)=etXetYe−tXe−tY\gamma(t) = e^{tX} e^{tY} e^{-tX} e^{-tY}, which lies in GG because GG is a group and γ(0)=I\gamma(0) = I. Expanding each factor to second order in tt (using esZ≈I+sZ+12s2Z2e^{sZ} \approx I + sZ + \tfrac12 s^2 Z^2) and multiplying out gives γ(t)=etXetYe−tXe−tY=I+t2[X,Y]+O(t3)\gamma(t) = e^{tX} e^{tY} e^{-tX} e^{-tY} = I + t^2[X,Y] + O(t^3); the linear terms in tt cancel exactly because it is a commutator ghg−1h−1g h g^{-1} h^{-1}, leaving a quadratic leading term equal to XY−YXXY - YX.

Step 3 (extracting the tangent vector). Reparametrize by s=t2s = t^2 and set σ(s)=γ(s)\sigma(s) = \gamma(\sqrt{s}) for s≥0s \ge 0; this is a smooth curve in GG with σ(0)=I\sigma(0) = I and σ′(0)=[X,Y]\sigma'(0) = [X,Y] by Step 2. Since σ\sigma is a curve through the identity of GG, its velocity vector [X,Y][X,Y] lies in TeG=gT_e G = \mathfrak{g} by definition of the tangent space. Hence [X,Y]∈g[X,Y] \in \mathfrak{g}.

Step 4 (Jacobi identity). Direct algebraic expansion of [X,[Y,Z]]+[Y,[Z,X]]+[Z,[X,Y]]=0[X,[Y,Z]] + [Y,[Z,X]] + [Z,[X,Y]] = 0 using [X,Y]=XY−YX[X,Y] = XY - YX shows every term of the form XYZXYZ appears exactly twice with opposite signs and cancels, so the identity holds automatically for any associative matrix product — no extra geometric input is needed once the bracket is XY−YXXY-YX. Together with bilinearity and antisymmetry [X,Y]=−[Y,X][X,Y]=-[Y,X] (immediate from the formula), this confirms (g,[⋅,⋅])(\mathfrak{g}, [\cdot,\cdot]) is a Lie algebra.

There is a linear isomorphism R3→so(3)\mathbb{R}^3 \to \mathfrak{so}(3), u↦Xuu \mapsto X_u, under which the Lie bracket corresponds exactly to the vector cross product: so(3)≅(R3,×),[Xu,Xv]=Xu×v\mathfrak{so}(3) \cong (\mathbb{R}^3, \times), \qquad [X_u, X_v] = X_{u \times v}. Consequently the 33-dimensional Lie algebra of the rotation group is, as an algebraic object, nothing more than R3\mathbb{R}^3 with the familiar cross product X×YX \times Y.

Why is it true?

This identification is exactly why angular velocity in physics is a 33-vector: the "instantaneous rotation rate" of a rigid body lives in so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3), and the isomorphism with (R3,×)(\mathbb{R}^3,\times) is why ω⃗×r⃗\vec\omega \times \vec r gives the velocity of a point r⃗\vec r on a spinning body.

Proof

Step 1 (basis). Every skew-symmetric X∈so(3)X \in \mathfrak{so}(3) has the form Xu=(0−u3u2u30−u1−u2u10)X_u = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -u_3 & u_2 \\ u_3 & 0 & -u_1 \\ -u_2 & u_1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} for a unique u=(u1,u2,u3)∈R3u=(u_1,u_2,u_3) \in \mathbb{R}^3 (three free entries above the diagonal determine the rest), and u↦Xuu \mapsto X_u is manifestly linear and bijective, so it is a linear isomorphism of 33-dimensional vector spaces.

Step 2 (action on vectors). A direct computation shows Xuv=u×vX_u v = u \times v for every v∈R3v \in \mathbb{R}^3, i.e. XuX_u acts on R3\mathbb{R}^3 exactly as "cross with uu".

Step 3 (bracket matches cross product). Using Step 2 twice, for any vv: [Xu,Xv]w=Xu(Xvw)−Xv(Xuw)=u×(v×w)−v×(u×w)[X_u,X_v]w = X_u(X_v w) - X_v(X_u w) = u\times(v\times w) - v\times(u\times w). Applying the vector triple-product identity a×(b×c)=b(a⋅c)−c(a⋅b)a\times(b\times c) = b(a\cdot c) - c(a\cdot b) to both terms and simplifying, the right side collapses to (u×v)×w=Xu×vw(u\times v)\times w = X_{u\times v} w for every ww, hence [Xu,Xv]=Xu×v[X_u,X_v] = X_{u\times v} as operators — exactly so(3)≅(R3,×),[Xu,Xv]=Xu×v\mathfrak{so}(3) \cong (\mathbb{R}^3, \times), \qquad [X_u, X_v] = X_{u \times v}.

Step 4 (conclusion). Since u↦Xuu \mapsto X_u is a linear bijection that turns the cross product into the matrix bracket, it is a Lie algebra isomorphism (R3,×)≅so(3)(\mathbb{R}^3,\times) \cong \mathfrak{so}(3), as claimed.

UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples

Lie theory is the mathematical backbone of anywhere continuous symmetry matters: robotics and aerospace use SO(3)SO(3) and its algebra so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) to integrate angular velocity into orientation; particle physics builds the Standard Model on the Lie group SU(3)×SU(2)×U(1)SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1), whose generators are Lie-algebra elements corresponding to force-carrying bosons; and computer graphics uses the exponential map exp⁡:g→G\exp: \mathfrak{g} \to G to smoothly interpolate rotations (quaternion "slerp" is literally geodesic motion in SU(2)SU(2), the double cover of SO(3)SO(3)).

Example: Angular velocity of a spinning satellite

A satellite's orientation is tracked by R(t)∈SO(3)R(t) \in SO(3). Its onboard gyroscope reports the body-frame angular velocity ω(t)∈R3\omega(t) \in \mathbb{R}^3 satisfying R′(t)=R(t)Xω(t)R'(t) = R(t) X_{\omega(t)} where Xω∈so(3)X_{\omega} \in \mathfrak{so}(3) is the skew matrix from ω\omega. If at some instant ω=(0,0,2)\omega = (0,0,2) rad/s (spinning about its own zz-axis), find XωX_\omega and the instantaneous rate of change of the first column of RR (the body's xx-axis direction in world coordinates), given that column is currently e1=(1,0,0)Te_1 = (1,0,0)^T.

Solution

Step 1: build the skew matrix. For ω=(0,0,2)\omega = (0,0,2), the standard formula Xω=(0−ω3ω2ω30−ω1−ω2ω10)X_\omega = \begin{pmatrix}0&-\omega_3&\omega_2\\\omega_3&0&-\omega_1\\-\omega_2&\omega_1&0\end{pmatrix} gives Xω=(0−20200000)X_\omega = \begin{pmatrix}0&-2&0\\2&0&0\\0&0&0\end{pmatrix}.

Step 2: apply R′=RXωR'=RX_\omega to the relevant column. Assuming at this instant R=IR = I (the body frame momentarily aligned with world frame), the derivative of the first column of RR is the first column of RXωR X_\omega, i.e. of XωX_\omega itself (since R=IR=I): Xωe1=(0,2,0)TX_\omega e_1 = (0,2,0)^T.

Step 3: interpret. The xx-axis direction is instantaneously swinging toward +y+y at 22 rad/s, exactly matching intuition: spinning about zz rotates xx toward yy at rate ω3=2\omega_3=2. This is the concrete meaning of "the Lie algebra linearizes the group action": we replaced the hard nonlinear rotation update by one matrix-vector multiplication.

Example: Standard Model gauge bosons as Lie algebra generators

The electroweak gauge group is SU(2)×U(1)SU(2)\times U(1), with Lie algebra su(2)⊕u(1)\mathfrak{su}(2)\oplus\mathfrak{u}(1). su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2) is 33-dimensional (isomorphic to so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) exactly as in the theorem above, up to a factor of 22), and u(1)\mathfrak{u}(1) is 11-dimensional. Explain, using the dimension count of the Lie algebra, why the electroweak sector has exactly 44 gauge bosons before symmetry breaking, and identify which physical particles they become after the Higgs mechanism.

Solution

Step 1: count generators. In Yang-Mills gauge theory, each basis vector (generator) of the Lie algebra of the gauge group corresponds to one gauge boson field. dim⁡su(2)=3\dim \mathfrak{su}(2) = 3 and dim⁡u(1)=1\dim \mathfrak{u}(1) = 1, so dim⁡(su(2)⊕u(1))=3+1=4\dim(\mathfrak{su}(2)\oplus\mathfrak{u}(1)) = 3+1 = 4 generators total, hence 44 massless gauge bosons before symmetry breaking: conventionally labeled W1,W2,W3W^1,W^2,W^3 (from su(2)\mathfrak{su}(2)) and BB (from u(1)\mathfrak{u}(1)).

Step 2: symmetry breaking mixes them. The Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value that is not invariant under the full SU(2)×U(1)SU(2)\times U(1), only under a U(1)U(1) subgroup (electromagnetism). Three of the four original generators become "broken" and the corresponding bosons acquire mass by eating Higgs degrees of freedom (the Higgs mechanism), while one combination stays exactly massless.

Step 3: identify the physical particles. The linear combinations W±=(W1∓iW2)/2W^\pm = (W^1 \mp iW^2)/\sqrt2 become the massive charged W+,W−W^+,W^- bosons; a mixture of W3W^3 and BB (rotated by the Weinberg angle) becomes the massive neutral ZZ boson; the orthogonal combination remains massless and is the photon γ\gamma. So the 44-dimensional Lie algebra count directly predicts the 44 observed electroweak gauge bosons: W+,W−,Z,γW^+, W^-, Z, \gamma.

What condition characterizes matrices XX in the Lie algebra so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3)?

What formula defines the Lie bracket used in this topic's central theorem?

Under the isomorphism u↦Xuu \mapsto X_u, what does [Xu,Xv][X_u, X_v] correspond to?

In the satellite example, spinning at ω=(0,0,2)\omega=(0,0,2) rad/s with R=IR=I, what is the instantaneous velocity of the direction e1=(1,0,0)Te_1=(1,0,0)^T?

References

  1. Brian C. Hall (2015). Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations: An Elementary Introduction
  2. John Stillwell (2008). Naive Lie Theory
  3. Dennis Gaitsgory, Sam Raskin, et al. (2024). The Proof of the Geometric Langlands Conjecture · arXiv:2405.03599
  4. William Fulton, Joe Harris (1991). Representation Theory: A First Course