MathLabs

Grade 11

Parallelism and perpendicularity in space

How lines and planes relate in three dimensions: parallel, intersecting or perpendicular.

IntuitionA room full of parallel and perpendicular lines

Look around any room: the wall meets the floor along a straight edge, opposite walls never meet however far they extend, and a plumb line hanging from the ceiling drops straight down, perpendicular to the floor. Solid geometry gives precise names to these everyday relationships between lines and planes: parallel (never meeting, same "direction"), intersecting (crossing along a line), and perpendicular (meeting at a right angle). The interactive cube below lets you see all three at once.

Interactive 3D cube showing parallel faces, perpendicular edges and skew diagonals; drag to rotate and use the explode slider to pull the faces apart.
A cube: opposite faces lie in parallel planes, edges meeting at a vertex are perpendicular, and the two face diagonals on opposite faces (for example the diagonal of the bottom face and the diagonal of the top face going the other way) are skew: neither parallel nor intersecting.

SchoolParallelism between lines and planes

Definition: Line parallel to a plane; two parallel planes

A line dd is parallel to a plane (α)(\alpha) if they have no common point. Two planes (α)(\alpha) and (β)(\beta) are parallel if they have no common point (the case where they coincide is excluded; they must be genuinely disjoint).

d∥a,a⊂(α),d⊄(α)   ⟹   d∥(α)d \parallel a,\quad a \subset (\alpha),\quad d \not\subset (\alpha) \ \implies\ d \parallel (\alpha)

This is the standard test for a line being parallel to a plane: if d∥ad \parallel a for some line aa already lying in the plane (a⊂(α)a \subset (\alpha)), and dd itself is not in the plane (d⊄(α)d \not\subset (\alpha)), then d∥(α)d \parallel (\alpha). In words: to show a line avoids an entire plane, it is enough to find one line inside the plane that it is parallel to.

(α)∥(β)  ⟺  ∃ a,b⊂(α), a∩b={O}, a∥(β), b∥(β)(\alpha) \parallel (\beta) \iff \exists\, a, b \subset (\alpha),\ a \cap b = \{O\},\ a \parallel (\beta),\ b \parallel (\beta)

Two planes are parallel exactly when we can find two intersecting lines a,b⊂(α)a, b \subset (\alpha) (a∩b={O}a \cap b = \{O\}, so they are not parallel to each other) that are each parallel to the other plane (a∥(β)a \parallel (\beta) and b∥(β)b \parallel (\beta)). One line alone is not enough — a single line parallel to (β)(\beta) could still let (α)(\alpha) tilt and cut through (β)(\beta); a second, intersecting line pins the whole plane down.

Relations between lines and planes in space
RelationDefining condition
Two lines parallelCoplanar, no common point
Two lines skewNot coplanar (no common plane)
Line parallel to a planed∥(α)d \parallel (\alpha): no common point, line not in the plane
Two planes parallel(α)∥(β)(\alpha) \parallel (\beta): no common point
Line perpendicular to a planed⊥(α)d \perp (\alpha): perpendicular to every line of the plane

UndergraduatePerpendicularity: rigorous definitions and theorems

Definition: Line perpendicular to a plane

A line dd is perpendicular to a plane (α)(\alpha), written d⊥(α)d \perp (\alpha), if it is perpendicular to every line contained in that plane, not just to one or two of them.

d⊥(α)  ⟺  ∀ c⊂(α), d⊥cd \perp (\alpha) \iff \forall\, c \subset (\alpha),\ d \perp c

If d⊥ad \perp a and d⊥bd \perp b for two intersecting lines a,b⊂(α)a, b \subset (\alpha) with a∩b={O}a \cap b = \{O\}, then d⊥(α)d \perp (\alpha).

Why is it true?

You do not need to check infinitely many lines in the plane. Just as two nails driven perpendicular to a floor along two different directions from the same point are enough to hold a post exactly upright, two independent perpendicularity checks pin down perpendicularity to the whole plane.

Proof

Place the intersection point OO at the origin, and let u⃗\vec{u} and v⃗\vec{v} be direction vectors of aa and bb. Since aa and bb intersect and are distinct lines, u⃗\vec{u} and v⃗\vec{v} are linearly independent, so together they span every direction lying in the plane (α)(\alpha): the direction vector of any line c⊂(α)c \subset (\alpha) can be written as w⃗=λu⃗+μv⃗\vec{w} = \lambda \vec{u} + \mu \vec{v} for some real numbers λ,μ\lambda, \mu.

Let n⃗\vec{n} be a direction vector of dd. The hypotheses d⊥ad \perp a and d⊥bd \perp b translate to the dot-product equations n⃗⋅u⃗=0\vec{n} \cdot \vec{u} = 0 and n⃗⋅v⃗=0\vec{n} \cdot \vec{v} = 0. For a line cc in (α)(\alpha) with direction w⃗=λu⃗+μv⃗\vec{w} = \lambda \vec{u} + \mu \vec{v}, linearity of the dot product gives n⃗⋅w⃗=λ(n⃗⋅u⃗)+μ(n⃗⋅v⃗)=λ⋅0+μ⋅0=0\vec{n} \cdot \vec{w} = \lambda(\vec{n}\cdot\vec{u}) + \mu(\vec{n}\cdot\vec{v}) = \lambda \cdot 0 + \mu \cdot 0 = 0.

Since the dot product of n⃗\vec{n} with the direction of an arbitrary line c⊂(α)c \subset (\alpha) is zero, dd is perpendicular to every line of (α)(\alpha), which is exactly the definition of d⊥(α)d \perp (\alpha).

Let a line dd not lie in and not be perpendicular to a plane (α)(\alpha), and let d1d_1 be the orthogonal projection of dd onto that plane (α)(\alpha). Then for any line aa contained in (α)(\alpha): a⊥da \perp d if and only if a⊥d1a \perp d_1.

Why is it true?

Checking perpendicularity to a slanted (oblique) line directly is awkward, but its shadow d1d_1 lies flat inside the plane, where perpendicularity is easy to see and measure. This theorem says the two checks always agree, so you may always replace the hard 3D check with the easy 2D one.

Proof

Fix a point AA on dd outside (α)(\alpha), and let HH be the foot of the perpendicular from AA to (α)(\alpha), so AH⊥(α)AH \perp (\alpha); by definition of orthogonal projection, HH lies on d1d_1. Because AHAH is perpendicular to the entire plane (α)(\alpha), it is perpendicular to the line aa inside that plane: AH⊥aAH \perp a. Meanwhile dd, d1d_1 and AHAH all lie in one vertical plane.

(⇒\Rightarrow) Suppose a⊥da \perp d. Then aa is perpendicular to both dd and AHAH, which are two intersecting lines of that vertical plane. By the line–plane perpendicularity criterion, aa is perpendicular to the whole vertical plane, and therefore to d1d_1, which lies in it; hence a⊥d1a \perp d_1.

(⇐\Leftarrow) Conversely, suppose a⊥d1a \perp d_1. Then aa is perpendicular to both d1d_1 and AHAH, again two intersecting lines of the same vertical plane. The same criterion makes aa perpendicular to that vertical plane, and therefore to dd; hence a⊥da \perp d.

Definition: Dihedral angle and distance between skew lines

When two planes (α)(\alpha) and (β)(\beta) intersect along an edge cc, pick a point II on cc and draw in each plane the line through II perpendicular to cc: p⊂(α)p \subset (\alpha) with p⊥cp \perp c, and q⊂(β)q \subset (\beta) with q⊥cq \perp c. The angle ((α),(β))=(p,q)\big((\alpha), (\beta)\big) = (p, q) between pp and qq is the plane angle of the dihedral angle. For two skew lines aa and bb, there is a unique common perpendicular segment MNMN (MM on aa, NN on bb, MN⊥aMN \perp a, MN⊥bMN \perp b); its length d(a,b)=MNd(a, b) = MN is the shortest distance between the two lines.

d(a,b)=min⁡P∈a, Q∈bPQ=MN,MN⊥a, MN⊥bd(a, b) = \min_{P \in a,\, Q \in b} PQ = MN,\qquad MN \perp a,\ MN \perp b

UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples

Every building column checked with a spirit level along two perpendicular walls uses the line–plane perpendicularity criterion; aircraft designers choose the upward "dihedral angle" between left and right wings so a rolling plane naturally rights itself; and roboticists and civil engineers compute the skew-line distance between two non-parallel pipes, cables or robot links to verify they will not collide.

Example: Roof pitch (dihedral angle) via the Three Perpendiculars Theorem

A pavilion roof has the shape of a pyramid S.ABCDS.ABCD over a square floor ABCDABCD of side 44 m, with the vertical post SA=4SA = 4 m standing perpendicular to the floor (SA⊥(ABCD)SA \perp (ABCD)). Find the dihedral angle that the sloped roof panel (SBC)(SBC) makes with the floor ABCDABCD along the eave BCBC.

Solution

Because SA⊥(ABCD)SA \perp (ABCD), the orthogonal projection of the slanted edge SBSB onto the floor ABCDABCD is the side ABAB. In the square ABCDABCD, the eave BCBC is perpendicular to ABAB (AB⊥BCAB \perp BC). By the Three Perpendiculars Theorem, BCBC is also perpendicular to the slanted edge SBSB (SB⊥BCSB \perp BC).

Since ABAB (in the floor) and SBSB (in the roof panel (SBC)(SBC)) both meet the eave BCBC at right angles at the same point, the dihedral angle along BCBC is simply the acute angle ∠SBA\angle SBA of the right triangle △SAB\triangle SAB (right-angled at AA because SASA is vertical). Computing tan⁡(∠SBA)=SAAB=44=1\tan(\angle SBA) = \frac{SA}{AB} = \frac{4}{4} = 1 gives ∠SBA\angle SBA = 45∘45^\circ.

Example: Clearance between two skew cables in a cubic frame

In a cubic steel frame ABCD.A′B′C′D′ABCD.A'B'C'D' of edge length 66 m, one vertical conduit runs along the corner post AA′AA' while a diagonal tension cable runs across the floor along BDBD. Find the shortest distance between these two skew lines.

Solution

Let OO be the center of the square floor, where the two floor diagonals meet. In a square, the diagonals bisect each other at right angles, so the half-diagonal AOAO satisfies AO⊥BDAO \perp BD.

Meanwhile, the vertical corner post satisfies AA′⊥(ABCD)AA' \perp (ABCD), and since AOAO lies in the floor plane, we also have AO⊥AA′AO \perp AA'. Therefore AOAO meets both AA′AA' (at AA) and BDBD (at OO) at right angles — it is the unique common perpendicular segment of the two skew lines. Its length is half the diagonal of a square of side 66 m: AO=12AC=622=32AO = \frac{1}{2} AC = \frac{6\sqrt{2}}{2} = 3\sqrt{2} m.

To conclude d⊥(α)d \perp (\alpha) from d⊥ad \perp a and d⊥bd \perp b with aa, bb lying in (α)(\alpha), what extra condition on aa and bb is required?

In the pyramid S.ABCDS.ABCD with square base ABCDABCD, SA⊥(ABCD)SA \perp (ABCD) and SA=AB=aSA = AB = a. What is the dihedral angle between the lateral face (SBC)(SBC) and the base ABCDABCD?

In a cube ABCD.A′B′C′D′ABCD.A'B'C'D' of edge length 66, what is the shortest distance between the vertical edge AA′AA' and the base diagonal BDBD?

A carpenter checks a vertical timber post with a spirit level along two chalk lines drawn on a flat concrete slab. How should the two chalk lines be chosen so that passing both checks guarantees the post is perpendicular to the slab?

References

  1. Euclid; trans. T. L. Heath (1908). Euclid's Elements, Book XI (perpendicularity and parallelism of lines and planes)
  2. Wikipedia contributors (2024). Dihedral angle