MathLabs

Open problem, Arithmetic and number theory, Combinatorics and discrete mathematics, posed 1973

Erdős conjecture on arithmetic progressions

OpenErdős

Let A⊆Z+A \subseteq \mathbb{Z}^+ be a set of positive integers whose reciprocals form a divergent series, ∑n∈A1n=∞\sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{n} = \infty. Then AA contains arithmetic progressions of every finite length k≥3k \ge 3.

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, the conjecture is completely proved for k=3k = 3 (Bloom–Sisask, 2020), with the quantitative bound subsequently sharpened to r3(N)≤exp⁡(−c(log⁡N)1/9)Nr_3(N) \le \exp(-c (\log N)^{1/9}) N following Kelley–Meka (2023) and Bloom–Sisask (2023). For k≥4k \ge 4, the conjecture remains open: the best upper bounds on rk(N)r_k(N) (Green–Tao for k=4k = 4, Leng–Sah–Sawhney 2024 for k≥5k \ge 5 giving rk(N)≤Nexp⁡(−(log⁡log⁡N)ck)r_k(N) \le N \exp(-(\log \log N)^{c_k})) are still too weak to make ∑rk(N)/N2\sum r_k(N)/N^2 converge.

Best known results

  • Every set AA with ∑n∈A1n=∞\sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{n} = \infty contains infinitely many 33-term arithmetic progressions (Bloom and Sisask, 2020).
  • Quasi-polynomial bound for 33-term progressions: r3(N)≤exp⁡(−c(log⁡N)1/9)Nr_3(N) \le \exp(-c (\log N)^{1/9}) N (Kelley–Meka, 2023; Bloom–Sisask, 2023).
  • For k≥5k \ge 5, improved inverse theorem bounds give rk(N)≤Nexp⁡(−(log⁡log⁡N)ck)r_k(N) \le N \exp(-(\log \log N)^{c_k}) (Leng, Sah, and Sawhney, 2024).

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
Spectral boosting, almost-periodicity, and sifting in Fourier analysisResolves the k=3k = 3 case by showing that 33-progression-free sets have strong density increments on Bohr sets, yielding r3(N)≪N/(log⁡N)1+εr_3(N) \ll N / (\log N)^{1+\varepsilon}.Linear Fourier analysis only controls 33-term progressions; progressions of length k≥4k \ge 4 depend on higher-order Gowers uniformity norms Uk−1U^{k-1}.
Higher-order Fourier analysis and Gowers Uk−1U^{k-1} inverse theoremsCorrelates functions having large Uk−1U^{k-1} norm with nilsequences, yielding explicit quantitative bounds rk(N)=o(N)r_k(N) = o(N) for all k≥4k \ge 4.Passing to high-dimensional nilmanifolds incurs double-logarithmic losses, falling short of the N/(log⁡N)1+εN / (\log N)^{1+\varepsilon} bound needed for ∑Nrk(N)N2<∞\sum_{N} \frac{r_k(N)}{N^2} < \infty.

Open questions

  • Does every subset of Z+\mathbb{Z}^+ with ∑n∈A1n=∞\sum_{n \in A} \frac{1}{n} = \infty contain a 44-term arithmetic progression (k=4k = 4)?
  • Does the bound rk(N)≪N/(log⁡N)1+εr_k(N) \ll N / (\log N)^{1 + \varepsilon} hold for all k≥4k \ge 4?

References

  1. Thomas F. Bloom, Olof Sisask (2020). Breaking the logarithmic barrier in Roth's theorem on arithmetic progressions · arXiv:2007.03528
  2. Zander Kelley, Raghu Meka (2023). Strong bounds for 3-progressions · arXiv:2302.05537
  3. Ben Green, Terence Tao (2008). The primes contain arbitrarily long arithmetic progressions · DOI:10.4007/annals.2008.167.481