MathLabs

Open problem, Geometry, Combinatorics and discrete mathematics, posed 1946

Erdős unit distance problem

OpenErdős

Determine the asymptotic order of magnitude of u(n)u(n), the maximum number of pairs of points separated by Euclidean distance 11 among any set of nn points in the plane R2\mathbb{R}^2.

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, the exact asymptotic exponent of u(n)u(n) in the Euclidean plane remains open, though the landscape shifted dramatically in May 2026. For eighty years, the best lower bound was Erdős's 1946 integer-grid bound n1+c/log⁡log⁡nn^{1+c/\log\log n}, and Erdős conjectured that u(n)=n1+o(1)u(n) = n^{1+o(1)}. In May 2026, an AI-discovered algebraic number field construction (verified in preprints by Alon et al. and refined by Sawin) disproved Erdős's conjecture, proving u(n)=Ω(n1.014)u(n) = \Omega(n^{1.014}) and narrowing the true growth rate to lie strictly between a power-saving polynomial above n1n^1 and the 1984 Spencer–Szemerédi–Trotter upper bound O(n4/3)O(n^{4/3}).

Best known results

  • The best general upper bound is u(n)=O(n4/3)u(n) = O(n^{4/3}), proved by Spencer, Szemerédi, and Trotter (1984).
  • An explicit lower bound of u(n)>n1.014u(n) > n^{1.014} for arbitrarily large nn was established in 2026 (Sawin, preprint, building on the OpenAI counterexample verified by Alon et al.), disproving Erdős's n1+o(1)n^{1+o(1)} conjecture.

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
Incidence geometry and crossing number inequalities (Szemerédi–Trotter, Székely)Proves the upper bound u(n)=O(n4/3)u(n) = O(n^{4/3}) by bounding incidences between nn points and nn unit circlesTopological and bipartite-graph crossing bounds cannot distinguish unit Euclidean circles from pseudocircles that genuinely achieve Θ(n4/3)\Theta(n^{4/3}) incidences
Algebraic number fields and Golod–Shafarevich class field towers (Alon et al., Sawin)Constructs point sets in C≅R2\mathbb{C} \cong \mathbb{R}^2 from number fields of large degree with small discriminant and many split primes of norm 11, achieving u(n)>n1.014u(n) > n^{1.014}Sawin showed that known unconditional number-field constructions via this framework cannot push the exponent beyond roughly 1.21431.2143, leaving a gap below 4/34/3

Open questions

  • What is the true asymptotic exponent lim sup⁡n→∞log⁡u(n)log⁡n\limsup_{n \to \infty} \frac{\log u(n)}{\log n} in the Euclidean plane?
  • Can the O(n4/3)O(n^{4/3}) upper bound be improved to O(n4/3−c)O(n^{4/3 - c}) for some c>0c > 0 using algebraic rigidity of unit circles?

References

  1. Paul Erdős (1946). On sets of distances of n points · DOI:10.1080/00029890.1946.11991674
  2. Joel Spencer, Endre Szemerédi, William T. Trotter (1984). Unit distances in the Euclidean plane · DOI:10.1007/pl00000428
  3. Noga Alon, Thomas F. Bloom, W. T. Gowers, Daniel Litt, Will Sawin, Arul Shankar, Jacob Tsimerman, Victor Wang, Melanie Matchett Wood (2026). Remarks on the disproof of the unit distance conjecture · arXiv:2605.20695v1 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]
  4. Will Sawin (2026). An explicit lower bound for the unit distance problem · arXiv:2605.20579v1 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]