MathLabs

Open problem, Geometry, posed 1950

Heilbronn triangle problem

Open

For n≥3n \ge 3 points placed inside a compact convex region of area 11 in the plane (such as the unit square [0,1]2[0,1]^2 or the unit-area disk), let Δ(n)\Delta(n) denote the supremum over all nn-point configurations of the minimum area of a triangle formed by three of the points. Determine the asymptotic order of growth of Δ(n)\Delta(n) as n→∞n \to \infty.

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, the Heilbronn triangle problem remains wide open, with a large polynomial gap between the best known lower bound Δ(n)=Ω(log⁡n/n2)\Delta(n) = \Omega(\log n / n^2) (Komlós–Pintz–Szemerédi, 1982) and the best known upper bound Δ(n)≤n−7/6+o(1)\Delta(n) \le n^{-7/6 + o(1)} (Cohen–Pohoata–Zakharov, 2024, `arXiv:2409.07658`). After Komlós, Pintz, and Szemerédi established Δ(n)≤n−8/7+o(1)\Delta(n) \le n^{-8/7 + o(1)} in 1981, the upper bound exponent 8/7≈1.14298/7 \approx 1.1429 stood unchanged for over forty years until Cohen, Pohoata, and Zakharov (`arXiv:2305.18253`, 2023) improved it to 8/7+1/20008/7 + 1/2000 and subsequently to 7/6≈1.16677/6 \approx 1.1667 in 2024 by reframing Roth's strip argument in terms of multiscale incidences between points and δ\delta-tubes.

Best known results

  • Upper bound: Δ(n)≤n−7/6+o(1)\Delta(n) \le n^{-7/6 + o(1)} (Alex Cohen, Cosmin Pohoata, and Dmitrii Zakharov, 2024, `arXiv:2409.07658`).
  • Lower bound: Δ(n)=Ω(log⁡n/n2)\Delta(n) = \Omega(\log n / n^2) (János Komlós, János Pintz, and Endre Szemerédi, 1982).

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
High-low Fourier method and multiscale point-tube incidences (Cohen–Pohoata–Zakharov)Converts the absence of small-area triangles into lower bounds on incidences between points and narrow strips (δ\delta-tubes) across scales, improving the upper bound exponent from 8/78/7 to 7/67/6.Two-step incidence arguments only track pairs of points and the strips they determine; reaching exponents near 22 would require controlling higher-order multi-point correlations.
Semi-random hypergraph independence (Ajtai–Komlós–Pintz–Spencer–Szemerédi)Finds an independent set in a 33-uniform hypergraph of small-area triples with few short cycles, gaining an extra log⁡n\log n factor over Erdős's 1/n21/n^2 construction.At area threshold ≫log⁡n/n2\gg \log n / n^2, triangles in the hypergraph share edges and form dense local clusters that break the uncrowded hypergraph condition.

Open questions

  • Is the true asymptotic order of Δ(n)\Delta(n) equal to Θ(log⁡n/n2)\Theta(\log n / n^2), or can configurations achieve Δ(n)≥n−2+δ\Delta(n) \ge n^{-2 + \delta} for some δ>0\delta > 0?

References

  1. János Komlós, János Pintz, Endre Szemerédi (1982). A lower bound for Heilbronn's problem · DOI:10.1112/jlms/s2-25.1.13
  2. Alex Cohen, Cosmin Pohoata, Dmitrii Zakharov (2023). A new upper bound for the Heilbronn triangle problem · arXiv:2305.18253
  3. Alex Cohen, Cosmin Pohoata, Dmitrii Zakharov (2024). Lower bounds for incidences · arXiv:2409.07658 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]