MathLabs

Open problem, Arithmetic and number theory, posed 1930

Littlewood conjecture

Open

For every pair of real numbers (α,β)∈R2(\alpha, \beta) \in \mathbb{R}^2, lim inf⁡n→∞n ∥nα∥ ∥nβ∥=0\liminf_{n \to \infty} n \, \|n\alpha\| \, \|n\beta\| = 0, where ∥x∥\|x\| denotes the distance from xx to the nearest integer.

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, Littlewood's conjecture remains open. The landmark 2006 theorem of Einsiedler, Katok, and Lindenstrauss proves that the set of exceptions (α,β)∈R2(\alpha, \beta) \in \mathbb{R}^2 has Hausdorff dimension 00, using measure rigidity for higher-rank diagonal actions on SL(3,R)/SL(3,Z)\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{Z}). Subsequent work has verified the conjecture when α\alpha lies in specific fractal sets (such as missing-digit Cantor sets) or satisfies explicit continued-fraction growth conditions, and has established quantitative density bounds. However, measure rigidity requires positive entropy, leaving open the possibility of isolated or zero-entropy non-algebraic bounded orbits.

Best known results

  • Einsiedler, Katok, and Lindenstrauss (2006): the set of pairs (α,β)∈R2(\alpha, \beta) \in \mathbb{R}^2 violating Littlewood's conjecture has Hausdorff dimension 00.
  • Cassels and Swinnerton-Dyer (1955): the conjecture holds whenever 1,α,β1, \alpha, \beta span a cubic number field over Q\mathbb{Q}.

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
Measure rigidity on homogeneous spaces (SL(3,R)/SL(3,Z)\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{Z}))Classifies positive-entropy invariant measures under the diagonal action and forces the exceptional set to have Hausdorff dimension 00Cannot classify invariant measures of entropy 00, so it cannot rule out individual bounded trajectories that carry no positive-entropy measure
Continued fractions and unit groups in number fieldsSettles the conjecture when α\alpha is not badly approximable or when (α,β)(\alpha, \beta) lies in a cubic field over Q\mathbb{Q}Higher dimensions lack a canonical periodic continued-fraction algorithm for general pairs (α,β)(\alpha, \beta)

Open questions

  • Is every bounded orbit of the diagonal group AA in SL(3,R)/SL(3,Z)\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SL}(3, \mathbb{Z}) periodic (compact), which would imply Littlewood's conjecture in full?
  • Does the pp-adic Littlewood conjecture lim inf⁡n→∞n ∣n∣p ∥nα∥=0\liminf_{n \to \infty} n \, |n|_p \, \|n\alpha\| = 0 hold for every real number α\alpha and every prime pp?

References

  1. Manfred Einsiedler, Anatole Katok, Elon Lindenstrauss (2006). Invariant measures and the set of exceptions to Littlewood's conjecture · DOI:10.4007/annals.2006.164.513 · arXiv:math/0612721
  2. J. W. S. Cassels, H. P. F. Swinnerton-Dyer (1955). On the product of three homogeneous linear forms and the indefinite ternary quadratic forms · DOI:10.1098/rsta.1955.0010
  3. Manfred Einsiedler, Elon Lindenstrauss (2006). Open problems in dynamical diophantine approximation