MathLabs

Open problem, Probability and statistics, posed 1957

Continuity of the phase transition in 3D percolation

Open

For Bernoulli bond (or site) percolation on Z3\mathbb{Z}^3 with parameter pp, let θ(p)=Pp(0↔∞)\theta(p) = \mathbb{P}_p(0 \leftrightarrow \infty) be the probability that the origin lies in an infinite open cluster, and let pc=sup⁡{p:θ(p)=0}p_c = \sup\{p : \theta(p) = 0\} be the critical probability. Is θ(pc)=0\theta(p_c) = 0, i.e. is the percolation function continuous at pcp_c?

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, continuity of θ\theta at pcp_c is proven for d=2d = 2 (Kesten 1980 and related work) and for d≥11d \ge 11 via the lace expansion (Fitzner–van der Hofstad 2017, sharpening Hara–Slade's original d≥19d \ge 19). The physically relevant case d=3d = 3 (and the range 3≤d≤103 \le d \le 10) remains open; the March 2026 proof of supercritical sharpness on all infinite transitive graphs by Diskin, Easo, Radhakrishnan, Sudakov, and Tassion resolves a companion 1996 conjecture of Benjamini and Schramm but explicitly leaves the behavior exactly at pcp_c on Z3\mathbb{Z}^3 open, as emphasized in the paper's own discussion.

Best known results

  • Continuity of the phase transition (θ(pc)=0\theta(p_c) = 0) is proven rigorously only for d=2d = 2 (Kesten 1980, Harris 1960) and d≥11d \ge 11 (Fitzner–van der Hofstad 2017, via the lace expansion); the cases 3≤d≤103 \le d \le 10, including the physically important d=3d = 3, are open.
  • Sharpness of the phase transition (exponential decay for p<pcp < p_c) holds unconditionally in every dimension dd (Aizenman–Barsky and Menshikov 1987), and supercritical sharpness now holds on every infinite transitive graph (Diskin–Easo–Radhakrishnan–Sudakov–Tassion 2026), but neither result determines the value θ(pc)\theta(p_c) itself.

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
Lace expansion (with non-backtracking refinement)Rigorously proves mean-field critical exponents and continuity of θ\theta at pcp_c for nearest-neighbor percolation on Zd\mathbb{Z}^d, d≥11d \ge 11The expansion coefficients fail to be summably small below d≈10d \approx 10–1111, since low-dimensional lattices have too many short self-intersecting loops for the perturbative series to converge
Russo–Seymour–Welsh (RSW) theory and planar dualityProves crossing probability estimates that pin down pc=1/2p_c = 1/2 and continuity of the phase transition for two-dimensional lattice percolationFundamentally relies on planar duality (interfaces between open and closed clusters are curves) and has no known analogue in three or more dimensions

Open questions

  • Is θ(pc)=0\theta(p_c) = 0 for Bernoulli bond percolation on Z3\mathbb{Z}^3?
  • What is the smallest dimension dd below which the lace-expansion approach could in principle be pushed to prove continuity, and is d=6d = 6 (the conjectured upper critical dimension) the true dividing line between mean-field and non-mean-field behavior?

References

  1. Harry Kesten (1980). The critical probability of bond percolation on the square lattice equals 1/2 · DOI:10.1007/BF01221263
  2. Michael Aizenman, David J. Barsky (1987). Sharpness of the phase transition in percolation models · DOI:10.1007/BF01212322
  3. Robert Fitzner, Remco van der Hofstad (2017). Mean-field behavior for nearest-neighbor percolation in d>10d > 10 · DOI:10.1214/17-EJP56 · arXiv:1506.07977
  4. Sahar Diskin, Philip Easo, Ritvik Ramanan Radhakrishnan, Benny Sudakov, Vincent Tassion (2026). Supercritical percolation on all infinite transitive graphs · arXiv:2603.03257 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]