Radius of convergence via the ratio test
Statement
For the power series , suppose exists (as a finite number or ). Then the radius of convergence is , with the convention that if and if .
Why is it true?
The ratio test compares consecutive terms of the series to a geometric series: if the ratio of consecutive terms is eventually less than 1 in absolute value, the series behaves like a convergent geometric series and adds up to a finite number.
Proof sketch
Fix and apply the ratio test to the terms of the numerical series . We compute
.
By the ratio test for numerical series, converges absolutely when , i.e. when , and diverges when , i.e. when . So the series converges absolutely for every with and diverges for every with .
This is exactly the definition of the radius of convergence: the largest such that the series converges for all . Hence . The boundary cases (ratio always shrinks to 0, so the series converges for every , giving ) and (ratio blows up for any , so the series converges only at , giving ) follow the same argument taking the appropriate limits.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.