Bézout's identity
Statement
For integers not both , there exist integers such that .
Why is it true?
It shows the greatest common divisor is not just the "biggest shared factor" but is actually reachable as an integer combination of and — the key fact that makes the solvability criterion for work.
Proof sketch
Consider the set of all strictly positive integer combinations of and . Since are not both , is nonempty (it contains or ), so by the well-ordering principle has a least element .
We show : divide with . Then is itself an integer combination of . If then would belong to and be smaller than , contradicting minimality; so , i.e. . The identical argument with in place of shows .
Since is a common divisor of and , . Conversely, any common divisor of and divides , so ; taking gives .
Combining both inequalities, , and by construction , which is exactly Bézout's identity with .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Wikipedia contributors (2024). Bézout's identity
- G. H. Hardy, E. M. Wright (2008). An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers