MathLabs
TheoremProved

Cauchy's integral formula

Statement

Let U⊂CU \subset \mathbb{C} be an open domain, let f:U→Cf : U \to \mathbb{C} be holomorphic, and let γ\gamma be a positively oriented simple closed contour in UU whose interior lies entirely in UU. Then for every point z0z_0 in the interior of γ\gamma, f(z0)=12πi∮γf(z)z−z0 dzf(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}\,dz, and more generally f(n)(z0)=n!2πi∮γf(z)(z−z0)n+1 dzf^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \oint_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{(z - z_0)^{n+1}}\,dz for every integer n≥0n \ge 0.

Why is it true?

A holomorphic function behaves like a taut soap film: its values on a boundary curve γ\gamma completely lock in its value at every point z0z_0 inside. Dividing by z−z0z - z_0 creates a single pole at z0z_0 that acts like a magnifying probe; when you integrate around γ\gamma, Cauchy's integral theorem lets you shrink the loop down to an infinitesimal circle around z0z_0, where f(z)f(z) is essentially constant at f(z0)f(z_0) and the winding of 1/(z−z0)1/(z - z_0) contributes exactly 2πi2\pi i. Even more remarkably, differentiating under the integral sign shows that being complex-differentiable just once automatically forces ff to be infinitely differentiable and analytic.

Proof sketch

Excise a small disk of radius r>0r > 0 centered at z0z_0 from the interior of γ\gamma. Because f(z)/(z−z0)f(z)/(z - z_0) is holomorphic on the region between γ\gamma and the circle Cr={∣z−z0∣=r}C_r = \{|z - z_0| = r\}, Cauchy's integral theorem implies ∮γf(z)z−z0 dz=∮Crf(z)z−z0 dz\oint_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}\,dz = \oint_{C_r} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}\,dz. Splitting the numerator as f(z)=f(z0)+(f(z)−f(z0))f(z) = f(z_0) + (f(z) - f(z_0)), the constant part integrates to f(z0)∮Crdzz−z0=2πi f(z0)f(z_0) \oint_{C_r} \frac{dz}{z - z_0} = 2\pi i\,f(z_0) via the parameterization z=z0+reiθz = z_0 + re^{i\theta}. By continuity of ff at z0z_0, the remainder satisfies ∣f(z)−f(z0)∣<ε|f(z) - f(z_0)| < \varepsilon on CrC_r for small rr, so its integral is bounded by ε(2πr)/r=2πε→0\varepsilon (2\pi r)/r = 2\pi \varepsilon \to 0 as r→0r \to 0. The formula for f(n)(z0)f^{(n)}(z_0) follows by induction using difference quotients and uniform convergence on compact subsets.

Stated by

Proved by

Topics that use this theorem

Related theorems

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Lars V. Ahlfors (1979). Complex Analysis
  2. Elias M. Stein, Rami Shakarchi (2003). Complex Analysis