Erdős's exponential lower bound for Ramsey numbers
Statement
For every integer , .
Why is it true?
As grows, the number of -subsets of an -vertex graph grows only polynomially in , but the chance that any particular subset is monochromatic shrinks doubly-exponentially in . Balancing these two rates shows the expected number of monochromatic cliques stays below even when is exponentially large in , which is far better than any bound anyone has managed to construct by hand.
Proof sketch
Set . From the first-moment computation above, . If we show , then since only takes nonnegative integer values, some 2-coloring must achieve — otherwise always, forcing . A coloring with has no monochromatic -clique at all.
Bound the binomial coefficient by , and since we get . Substituting into the expectation formula, .
Simplify the exponent: . So , and it suffices to show for every .
Check this by induction on . Base case : and , and indeed . For the inductive step, suppose holds at some . Then , and since , this exceeds , which is exactly the claim at . So holds for every , which gives as needed.
Therefore a 2-coloring of with no monochromatic -clique exists, so . Since for every real , this gives , which is exactly .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Noga Alon, Joel H. Spencer (2016). The Probabilistic Method
- Marcelo Campos, Simon Griffiths, Robert Morris, Julian Sahasrabudhe (2023). Towards fully exponential bounds for the diagonal Ramsey numbers · arXiv:2303.09521 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]
- Reinhard Diestel (2017). Graph Theory