MathLabs
TheoremProved

Erdős's exponential lower bound for Ramsey numbers

Statement

For every integer kk ≥3\ge 3, R(k,k)>2k/2R(k,k) > 2^{k/2}.

Why is it true?

As kk grows, the number of kk-subsets of an nn-vertex graph grows only polynomially in nn, but the chance that any particular subset is monochromatic shrinks doubly-exponentially in kk. Balancing these two rates shows the expected number of monochromatic cliques stays below 11 even when nn is exponentially large in kk, which is far better than any bound anyone has managed to construct by hand.

Proof sketch

Set n=⌊2k/2⌋n = \lfloor 2^{k/2} \rfloor. From the first-moment computation above, E[X]=(nk) 21−(k2)\mathbb{E}[X] = \binom{n}{k}\,2^{1-\binom{k}{2}}. If we show (nk) 21−(k2)<1\binom{n}{k}\,2^{1-\binom{k}{2}} < 1, then since XX only takes nonnegative integer values, some 2-coloring must achieve X=0X=0 — otherwise X≥1X \ge 1 always, forcing E[X]≥1\mathbb{E}[X]\ge 1. A coloring with X=0X=0 has no monochromatic kk-clique at all.

Bound the binomial coefficient by (nk)≤nk/k!\binom{n}{k} \le n^k/k!, and since n≤2k/2n \le 2^{k/2} we get nk≤2k2/2n^k \le 2^{k^2/2}. Substituting into the expectation formula, E[X]≤2k2/2⋅21−(k2)k!\mathbb{E}[X] \le \dfrac{2^{k^2/2}\cdot 2^{1-\binom{k}{2}}}{k!}.

Simplify the exponent: k22+1−k(k−1)2=1+k2−k2+k2=1+k2\dfrac{k^2}{2} + 1 - \dfrac{k(k-1)}{2} = 1 + \dfrac{k^2 - k^2 + k}{2} = 1 + \dfrac{k}{2}. So E[X]≤21+k/2k!\mathbb{E}[X] \le \dfrac{2^{1+k/2}}{k!}, and it suffices to show k!>21+k/2k! > 2^{1+k/2} for every k≥3k \ge 3.

Check this by induction on kk. Base case k=3k=3: 3!=63! = 6 and 21+3/2=22.5≈5.6572^{1+3/2} = 2^{2.5} \approx 5.657, and indeed 6>5.6576 > 5.657. For the inductive step, suppose k!>21+k/2k! > 2^{1+k/2} holds at some k≥3k \ge 3. Then (k+1)!=(k+1)⋅k!>(k+1)⋅21+k/2(k+1)! = (k+1)\cdot k! > (k+1)\cdot 2^{1+k/2}, and since k+1≥4>2k+1 \ge 4 > \sqrt2, this exceeds 2⋅21+k/2=21+(k+1)/2\sqrt2 \cdot 2^{1+k/2} = 2^{1+(k+1)/2}, which is exactly the claim at k+1k+1. So k!>21+k/2k! > 2^{1+k/2} holds for every k≥3k \ge 3, which gives (nk) 21−(k2)<1\binom{n}{k}\,2^{1-\binom{k}{2}} < 1 as needed.

Therefore a 2-coloring of KnK_n with no monochromatic kk-clique exists, so R(k,k)>n=⌊2k/2⌋R(k,k) > n = \lfloor 2^{k/2}\rfloor. Since ⌊x⌋+1>x\lfloor x\rfloor + 1 > x for every real xx, this gives R(k,k)≥⌊2k/2⌋+1>2k/2R(k,k) \ge \lfloor 2^{k/2}\rfloor + 1 > 2^{k/2}, which is exactly R(k,k)>2k/2R(k,k) > 2^{k/2}.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Noga Alon, Joel H. Spencer (2016). The Probabilistic Method
  2. Marcelo Campos, Simon Griffiths, Robert Morris, Julian Sahasrabudhe (2023). Towards fully exponential bounds for the diagonal Ramsey numbers · arXiv:2303.09521 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]
  3. Reinhard Diestel (2017). Graph Theory