Itô's lemma
Statement
Let be a standard Wiener process and let be twice continuously differentiable in and once in . Then the process satisfies — a stochastic chain rule with an extra second-derivative ("Itô correction") term compared to the ordinary chain rule.
Why is it true?
This is the single most-used tool in stochastic calculus: it tells you exactly how to differentiate a function of a random path, which is the starting point for deriving the dynamics of any quantity (an option price, a physical observable) that depends on Brownian motion.
Proof sketch
Taylor expand. For a smooth , the ordinary second-order Taylor expansion in both variables over a small step with reads — this much is pure calculus, valid for any smooth path.
Order the terms by size. Because is of order (not , as shown in the previous theorem), the terms scale as: is order ; is order (the dominant, leading-order random term); and are order and respectively, negligible compared to ; but is order — the same order as , not negligible at all, unlike in ordinary calculus where is always negligible next to .
Replace by its mean. By the quadratic variation theorem, summed over many small steps behaves like (its mean, with fluctuations around that mean vanishing as the steps shrink and are summed), which is the informal justification for the heuristic substitution rule in the limit of infinitesimal steps.
Take the limit. Dropping the negligible higher-order terms and substituting in the limit turns the Taylor expansion into the differential form exactly as claimed — the term is precisely the contribution that ordinary calculus discards but stochastic calculus must keep.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Ioannis Karatzas, Steven E. Shreve (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus
- Kiyosi Itô (1944). Stochastic Integral
- Fischer Black, Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities