MathLabs
TheoremProved

Itô's lemma

Statement

Let WtW_t be a standard Wiener process and let F(t,x)F(t,x) be twice continuously differentiable in xx and once in tt. Then the process F(t,Wt)F(t,W_t) satisfies dF=(∂tF+12∂x2F)dt+∂xF dWtdF=\Big(\partial_tF+\tfrac12\partial_x^2F\Big)dt+\partial_xF\,dW_t — a stochastic chain rule with an extra second-derivative ("Itô correction") term compared to the ordinary chain rule.

Why is it true?

This is the single most-used tool in stochastic calculus: it tells you exactly how to differentiate a function of a random path, which is the starting point for deriving the dynamics of any quantity (an option price, a physical observable) that depends on Brownian motion.

Proof sketch

Taylor expand. For a smooth FF, the ordinary second-order Taylor expansion in both variables over a small step Δt\Delta t with ΔW=Wt+Δt−Wt\Delta W=W_{t+\Delta t}-W_t reads ΔF≈∂tF Δt+∂xF ΔW+12∂x2F (ΔW)2+12∂t2F (Δt)2+∂t∂xF Δt ΔW+⋯\Delta F\approx \partial_tF\,\Delta t+\partial_xF\,\Delta W+\tfrac12\partial_x^2F\,(\Delta W)^2+\tfrac12\partial_t^2F\,(\Delta t)^2+\partial_t\partial_xF\,\Delta t\,\Delta W+\cdots — this much is pure calculus, valid for any smooth path.

Order the terms by size. Because ΔW\Delta W is of order Δt\sqrt{\Delta t} (not Δt\Delta t, as shown in the previous theorem), the terms scale as: ∂tF Δt\partial_tF\,\Delta t is order Δt\Delta t; ∂xF ΔW\partial_xF\,\Delta W is order Δt\sqrt{\Delta t} (the dominant, leading-order random term); (Δt)2(\Delta t)^2 and Δt ΔW\Delta t\,\Delta W are order (Δt)2(\Delta t)^2 and (Δt)3/2(\Delta t)^{3/2} respectively, negligible compared to Δt\Delta t; but (ΔW)2(\Delta W)^2 is order Δt\Delta t — the same order as ∂tF Δt\partial_tF\,\Delta t, not negligible at all, unlike in ordinary calculus where (Δx)2(\Delta x)^2 is always negligible next to Δx\Delta x.

Replace (ΔW)2(\Delta W)^2 by its mean. By the quadratic variation theorem, summed over many small steps (ΔW)2(\Delta W)^2 behaves like Δt\Delta t (its mean, with fluctuations around that mean vanishing as the steps shrink and are summed), which is the informal justification for the heuristic substitution rule (dWt)2=dt(dW_t)^2=dt in the limit of infinitesimal steps.

Take the limit. Dropping the negligible higher-order terms and substituting (ΔW)2→dt(\Delta W)^2\to dt in the limit Δt→0\Delta t\to0 turns the Taylor expansion into the differential form dF=(∂tF+12∂x2F)dt+∂xF dWtdF=\Big(\partial_tF+\tfrac12\partial_x^2F\Big)dt+\partial_xF\,dW_t exactly as claimed — the 12∂x2F dt\tfrac12\partial_x^2F\,dt term is precisely the contribution that ordinary calculus discards but stochastic calculus must keep.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Ioannis Karatzas, Steven E. Shreve (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus
  2. Kiyosi Itô (1944). Stochastic Integral
  3. Fischer Black, Myron Scholes (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities