MathLabs
TheoremProved

The discriminant form $\Delta$ is essentially unique

Statement

Define Δ\Delta from the weight-44 and weight-66 Eisenstein series E4,E6E_4,E_6 (each normalized with constant term 11) as below. Then Δ\Delta is a nonzero cusp form of weight 1212, it never vanishes anywhere on H\mathbb{H}, its only zero is a simple zero at the cusp ∞\infty, and dim⁡M4(SL2(Z))=1\dim M_4(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}))=1.

Why is it true?

This single computation both certifies that the space of weight-1212 cusp forms is 11-dimensional (spanned by Δ\Delta) and that Δ\Delta's non-vanishing on H\mathbb{H} is exactly what makes the jj-invariant j=E43/Δj=E_4^3/\Delta holomorphic on all of H\mathbb{H} — the fact that classifies elliptic curves over C\mathbb{C} up to isomorphism, the bridge to arithmetic geometry.

Proof sketch

First, holomorphy and weight: E4,E6E_4,E_6 are modular forms of weight 4,64,6 respectively (standard Eisenstein-series facts, taken as known input here), so E43E_4^3 and E62E_6^2 are both weight 1212. Both have Fourier expansion starting with constant term 11 (by normalization), so E43−E62E_4^3-E_6^2 has vanishing constant term: it is a cusp form of weight 1212, and Δ=(E43−E62)/1728\Delta=(E_4^3-E_6^2)/1728 is too, in particular ord⁡∞(Δ)≥1\operatorname{ord}_\infty(\Delta)\ge1.

Now apply the valence formula (proved above) with k=12k=12: the total weighted zero order of Δ\Delta must equal 12/12=112/12=1. Every term on the left — ord⁡∞(Δ)\operatorname{ord}_\infty(\Delta), 12ord⁡i(Δ)\tfrac12\operatorname{ord}_i(\Delta), 13ord⁡ρ(Δ)\tfrac13\operatorname{ord}_\rho(\Delta), and any ord⁡P(Δ)\operatorname{ord}_P(\Delta) for other points — is a non-negative real number, and we already know ord⁡∞(Δ)≥1\operatorname{ord}_\infty(\Delta)\ge1. The only way a sum of non-negative terms, one of which is already ≥1\ge1, can total exactly 11, is if that term equals exactly 11 and every other term is exactly 00. Hence ord⁡∞(Δ)=1\operatorname{ord}_\infty(\Delta)=1 exactly, and ord⁡P(Δ)=0\operatorname{ord}_P(\Delta)=0 for every P∈HP\in\mathbb{H}: Δ\Delta never vanishes on H\mathbb{H}, with a simple zero only at the cusp.

For the dimension claim: let gg be any weight-1212 cusp form. The quotient g/Δg/\Delta is SL2(Z)\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})-invariant (weight 12−12=012-12=0), and holomorphic on H\mathbb{H} since Δ\Delta never vanishes there. At the cusp, both gg and Δ\Delta vanish to order at least 11 in qq, and since Δ\Delta's order there is exactly 11, the quotient extends holomorphically (no pole) to q=0q=0 as well. A weight-00 modular function holomorphic everywhere on H\mathbb{H} and at the cusp descends to a holomorphic function on the compact Riemann surface X(1)≅P1(C)X(1)\cong\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{C}), which by Liouville's theorem (extended to the compactification) must be constant. So g=c⋅Δg=c\cdot\Delta for a constant cc: the space of weight-1212 cusp forms is exactly 11-dimensional. The identical argument at weight 44 (total budget 4/12=1/34/12=1/3, which can only be realized as ord⁡ρ=1\operatorname{ord}_\rho=1 with every other order 00, since any integer contribution — such as a nonzero ord⁡∞\operatorname{ord}_\infty — would already exceed 1/31/3) shows every nonzero weight-44 form has its unique zero at ρ\rho with order exactly 11 and no others, and the same quotient-by-E4E_4 trick forces dim⁡M4(SL2(Z))=1\dim M_4(\mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z}))=1.

Finally, the qq-product Δ(τ)=q∏n≥1(1−qn)24\Delta(\tau)=q\prod_{n\ge1}(1-q^n)^{24} is the classical identity discovered by Jacobi; we cite it here rather than re-derive it, but note it is fully consistent with what we just proved: the right-hand side visibly vanishes to order exactly 11 at q=0q=0 and is manifestly nonzero for 0<∣q∣<10<|q|<1 (a convergent product of nonzero factors), matching the zero-order profile forced by the valence formula above.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Jean-Pierre Serre (1973). A Course in Arithmetic
  2. Fred Diamond, Jerry Shurman (2005). A First Course in Modular Forms
  3. Andrew Wiles (1995). Modular Elliptic Curves and Fermat's Last Theorem · DOI:10.2307/2118559
  4. James Newton, Jack A. Thorne (2021). Symmetric power functoriality for holomorphic modular forms · DOI:10.1007/s10240-021-00127-3 · arXiv:1912.11261