Plancherel's theorem
Statement
If , then . In words: the Fourier transform preserves total energy, with no constant needed in this normalization.
Why is it true?
Physically, is the energy of a signal (think: power dissipated by a voltage waveform). Plancherel says you can compute that energy either by scanning the signal in time or by scanning its spectrum in frequency — a spectrum analyzer and an oscilloscope must agree on total power.
Proof sketch
Step 1 (a special case). First check the identity for a Gaussian . A direct computation (completing the square in the exponent) gives , so both sides of equal the same Gaussian integral .
Step 2 (extend by linearity and the convolution theorem). For nice (Schwartz) functions , write where ; then , and by the convolution theorem together with Fourier inversion, . This proves the identity for all Schwartz functions, which include Gaussians and all smooth rapidly-decaying functions.
Step 3 (density argument). Schwartz functions are dense in : every is a limit of Schwartz functions in the norm. Since the Fourier transform is an isometry on this dense subspace by Step 2, it extends uniquely to a bounded operator on all of that still satisfies — this extension is what 'the Fourier transform of an function' means when the defining integral may not converge absolutely.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Terence Tao (2003). Recent progress on the restriction conjecture · arXiv:math/0311181
- Elias M. Stein, Guido Weiss (1971). Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces
- Loukas Grafakos (2014). Classical Fourier Analysis · DOI:10.1007/978-1-4939-1194-3