MathLabs
FormulaProved

Euler–Lagrange equation

Statement

Let J[q]=∫t1t2L(t,q(t),q˙(t)) dtJ[q] = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} L(t, q(t), \dot q(t))\, dt be a functional on curves q(t)q(t) with fixed endpoints. A curve qq is a stationary point of JJ (in particular, if it minimizes or maximizes JJ) if and only if it satisfies, for each coordinate qiq_i, ddt(∂L∂q˙i)−∂L∂qi=0\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q_i}\right) - \dfrac{\partial L}{\partial q_i} = 0.

Why is it true?

Among all the paths a system could conceivably follow between two fixed events, the one nature actually takes is the one that makes the 'action' insensitive to small wiggles — nudging the path slightly in any direction, to first order, changes the action not at all. The Euler–Lagrange equation is exactly the local, pointwise condition that guarantees no such nudge can lower or raise the action, turning the global search over all paths into a differential equation you can solve step by step.

Proof sketch

Consider a variation qε(t)=q(t)+ε η(t)q_\varepsilon(t) = q(t) + \varepsilon\, \eta(t) with η(t1)=η(t2)=0\eta(t_1) = \eta(t_2) = 0. Stationarity means ddε∣ε=0J[qε]=0\frac{d}{d\varepsilon}\Big|_{\varepsilon=0} J[q_\varepsilon] = 0 for every such η\eta. Differentiating under the integral gives ∫t1t2(∂L∂qη+∂L∂q˙η˙)dt=0\int_{t_1}^{t_2} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q}\eta + \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\dot\eta\right) dt = 0; integrating the second term by parts (the boundary terms vanish since η(t1)=η(t2)=0\eta(t_1)=\eta(t_2)=0) gives ∫t1t2(∂L∂q−ddt∂L∂q˙)η dt=0\int_{t_1}^{t_2} \left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{dt}\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot q}\right)\eta\, dt = 0. Since η\eta is arbitrary, the fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations forces the bracketed expression to vanish identically, which is the Euler–Lagrange equation.

Stated by

Proved by

Topics that use this theorem

Related theorems

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. I. M. Gelfand, S. V. Fomin (1963). Calculus of Variations
  2. Herbert Goldstein, Charles P. Poole, John L. Safko (2002). Classical Mechanics