The fundamental group of the circle
Statement
, via the map sending a loop to its winding number (degree) : the net number of times wraps around the circle counterclockwise.
Why is it true?
It converts a geometric, hard-to-pin-down question ("how many essentially different loops are there on a circle?") into ordinary integer arithmetic, and is the single computation that all of algebraic topology's winding-number arguments trace back to.
Proof sketch
Step 1 — Set up the covering map. Let be , a continuous surjection where every point of has an evenly-covered neighborhood (a small arc's preimage under is a disjoint union of open intervals in , each mapped homeomorphically onto the arc). Fix basepoint .
Step 2 — Path lifting. Given any loop with , there is a unique continuous lift with and (construct it by covering with finitely many subintervals on which stays inside one evenly-covered neighborhood, and lift piece by piece, each time choosing the branch of continuing from the previous endpoint). Define (an integer since forces ).
Step 3 — Homotopy invariance. If via homotopy , the homotopy lifting property (proved the same way as path lifting, one strip at a time) gives a continuous lift with , and for all (constant, since it lifts the constant basepoint loop). Then is a continuous integer-valued function of (by the same argument as Step 2), hence constant; so . Thus is well-defined on homotopy classes .
Step 4 — Homomorphism property. For loops , lifting by first lifting to end at , then lifting starting from (a shifted copy of 's lift, valid since is invariant under integer translation) shows . So is a group homomorphism .
Step 5 — Bijectivity. Surjective: for any , is a loop with . Injective: if , the lift is a loop in based at (since ); is convex so the straight-line homotopy contracts to the constant path at rel endpoints, and composing with gives a path-homotopy from to the constant loop, so is trivial. Hence is a bijective homomorphism, i.e. an isomorphism .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Allen Hatcher (2002). Algebraic Topology
- James Munkres (2000). Topology
- Grigori Perelman (2002). The entropy of the Ricci flow and the Poincaré conjecture · arXiv:math/0211159
- Michael Farber (2003). Topological Robotics: Motion Planning in Projective Spaces