Fundamental theorem of Galois theory
Statement
For a finite Galois extension with Galois group , there is an inclusion-reversing bijection between the subgroups of and the intermediate fields , given by (the fixed field of ) and ; under this correspondence is a normal extension iff is a normal subgroup of , and then .
Why is it true?
Instead of studying an unwieldy field extension directly, Galois theory trades it for its (usually much smaller, finite) symmetry group . The correspondence says this trade loses nothing: every intermediate field sits between and in exactly the same pattern that a subgroup sits inside , just flipped upside down — bigger fields correspond to smaller groups. Questions about towers of fields (like 'can this be built with square roots?') become questions about the structure of a finite group, which are usually far easier to answer.
Proof sketch
Given a subgroup , is shown to be a field with ; linear independence of characters (Artin's lemma) shows , and separately , which pins down . Injectivity and surjectivity of follow from Artin's theorem that for every subgroup ; the normality statement follows because conjugating by corresponds to applying to the fixed field , so normal in is equivalent to being stable under all of , i.e. Galois.
Proved by
Topics that use this theorem
Related theorems
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Ian Stewart (2015). Galois Theory · DOI:10.1201/b18187