Discrete spectrum of the quantum harmonic oscillator
Statement
The Hamiltonian H^=2mP^2+21mω2X^2, with [X^,P^]=iℏ, has discrete, nondegenerate spectrum En=ℏω(n+21), n=0,1,2,….
Why is it true?
Rather than solving a differential equation directly, factor the Hamiltonian algebraically into 'raising' and 'lowering' operators, exactly as one factors a quadratic form. Positivity of the resulting number operator, plus the algebra of how the ladder operators shift its eigenvalues by one unit, forces the eigenvalues to form an evenly spaced ladder starting at a nonnegative bottom rung — energy quantization falls out of algebra alone.
Proof sketch
Step 1 (ladder operators). Define a^=2ℏmω(X^+mωiP^) and a^†=2ℏmω(X^−mωiP^). Using [X^,P^]=iℏ, a direct computation gives [a^,a^†]=2ℏmω(mω−i[X^,P^]+mωi[P^,X^])=2ℏ1(ℏ+ℏ)=1.
Step 2 (rewrite the Hamiltonian). Inverting, X^=2mωℏ(a^+a^†) and P^=i2mωℏ(a^†−a^); substituting into H^=2mP^2+21mω2X^2 and using [a^,a^†]=1 to reorder terms gives H^=ℏω(a^†a^+21). Define the number operator N^=a^†a^; it is self-adjoint, and for any state ϕ, ⟨ϕ∣N^∣ϕ⟩=∥a^ϕ∥2≥0, so every eigenvalue n of N^ satisfies n≥0.
Step 3 (ladder relations). From [a^,a^†]=1 one gets [N^,a^]=−a^ and [N^,a^†]=a^†. So if N^∣n⟩=n∣n⟩, then N^a^=a^N^−a^=a^(N^−1), giving N^(a^∣n⟩)=(n−1)(a^∣n⟩): a^ lowers the eigenvalue by 1 (or annihilates the state), and a^† raises it by 1.
Step 4 (termination and the spectrum). Because N^≥0, repeatedly applying a^ to any eigenstate cannot produce eigenvalues below 0; the descending chain n,n−1,n−2,… must terminate at n=0 (a non-integer starting value would force a negative eigenvalue after finitely many steps, a contradiction), so every eigenvalue of N^ is a nonnegative integer, and the ground state ∣0⟩ satisfies a^∣0⟩=0. Applying a^† repeatedly to ∣0⟩ produces normalizable eigenstates ∣n⟩∝(a^†)n∣0⟩ for every n=0,1,2,…, and no others exist. Substituting N^∣n⟩=n∣n⟩ into H^=ℏω(N^+21) gives En=ℏω(n+21).