Hilbert's Nullstellensatz
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field and let be an ideal of . Then , where is the radical of .
Why is it true?
It gives an exact dictionary between algebra and geometry: radical ideals of the polynomial ring correspond bijectively to affine varieties, so questions about shapes can be answered by pure ring computations, and vice versa. Without the hypothesis that is algebraically closed the dictionary breaks (over the reals, generates a nontrivial ideal with empty zero set).
Proof sketch
We sketch the weak form first: if is a proper ideal of then is nonempty. Pick a maximal ideal containing ; the quotient is a field, and it is a finitely generated -algebra. Zariski's lemma says any such field extension of is a finite algebraic extension of ; since is algebraically closed, this forces . The images of under this quotient map give a point with for every , so .
For the strong form , the inclusion is immediate: if then vanishes wherever every element of vanishes. The reverse inclusion uses the Rabinowitsch trick: to show implies , introduce a new variable and consider the ideal generated by together with in .
This enlarged ideal has empty zero set (any common zero would need every generator of to vanish, forcing to vanish there too, which contradicts ). By the weak Nullstellensatz just proved, the enlarged ideal must be the whole ring, so is a polynomial combination of the generators. Substituting and clearing denominators produces an explicit expression showing some power lies in , which is exactly .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Robin Hartshorne (1977). Algebraic Geometry (Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 52) · DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-3849-0
- David Mumford (1999). The Red Book of Varieties and Schemes (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 1358) · DOI:10.1007/b62130