Carathéodory's Theorem
Statement
If a point lies in the convex hull of a subset , then lies in the convex hull of at most points of .
Why is it true?
A convex combination in can a priori involve arbitrarily many points of , but in any or more points are affinely dependent. That linear relation lets you eliminate one point at a time while keeping all weights nonnegative until at most points remain (a simplex). Helly's theorem — that a finite family of convex sets in has a common point whenever every of them do — is a direct sibling of this dimension bound.
Proof sketch
Write with , , and , chosen so that the number of terms is minimal. We claim .
Suppose toward a contradiction that . Then the difference vectors in are linearly dependent, so there exist scalars , not all zero, such that . Setting gives and with at least one .
For any real we have with coefficients summing to . Choose ; then every new coefficient is nonnegative and at least one becomes , expressing as a convex combination of at most points of and contradicting the minimality of .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Peter M. Gruber (2007). Convex and Discrete Geometry (Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. 336) · DOI:10.1007/978-3-540-71133-9
- Maryna S. Viazovska (2017). The sphere packing problem in dimension 8 · arXiv:1603.04246
- Henry Cohn, Abhinav Kumar, Stephen D. Miller, Danylo Radchenko, Maryna Viazovska (2019). Universal optimality of the E8 and Leech lattices and interpolation formulas · arXiv:1902.05438