MathLabs
TheoremProved

Gauss–Bonnet theorem

Statement

For a compact, orientable surface MM without boundary, ∫MK dA=2πχ(M)\int_M K\,dA = 2\pi\chi(M), where χ(M)\chi(M) is the Euler characteristic, χ(M)=V−E+F\chi(M) = V - E + F for any triangulation of MM (also equal to 2−2g2 - 2g for a surface of genus gg).

Why is it true?

The theorem links a purely local, geometric quantity (curvature, which can change from point to point) to a purely global, topological quantity (the Euler characteristic, which only depends on how the surface is connected, not on its shape). No matter how you bend, stretch or dent a surface without tearing it, the total curvature ∫MK dA\int_M K\,dA stays the same.

Proof sketch

Triangulate MM using geodesic triangles (triangles whose sides are shortest paths on the surface), obtaining VV vertices, EE edges and FF faces, related by χ(M)=V−E+F\chi(M) = V - E + F.

The local Gauss–Bonnet formula for a single geodesic triangle TT with interior angles α,β,γ\alpha,\beta,\gamma states ∫TK dA=α+β+γ−π\int_T K\,dA = \alpha+\beta+\gamma-\pi: the amount the angle sum exceeds the Euclidean value π\pi equals exactly the integral of curvature over that triangle, a fact obtained by applying Stokes' theorem to the rotation of a tangent vector parallel-transported around the triangle's boundary.

Summing ∫TK dA=α+β+γ−π\int_T K\,dA = \alpha+\beta+\gamma-\pi over all FF triangles gives ∫MK dA=2πV−πF\int_M K\,dA = 2\pi V - \pi F: the triangles meeting at each of the VV vertices sweep out exactly one full turn 2π2\pi there, so all their angles together sum to 2πV2\pi V, while each of the FF triangles contributes a −π-\pi.

Each triangle has 33 edges and each edge is shared by exactly 22 triangles, so 3F=2E3F = 2E. Substituting E=3F2E = \frac{3F}{2} into χ(M)=V−E+F\chi(M) = V - E + F gives 2πχ(M)=2πV−πF2\pi\chi(M) = 2\pi V - \pi F, which matches the previous step exactly. Hence ∫MK dA=2πχ(M)\int_M K\,dA = 2\pi\chi(M), proving the theorem.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Manfredo P. do Carmo (2016). Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces
  2. Kristopher Tapp (2016). Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces