Integration by substitution
Statement
If is an antiderivative of and is differentiable, then .
Why is it true?
Substitution is nothing but the chain rule read backward: differentiating a composite function produces exactly the pattern "outer derivative times inner derivative," . So whenever an integrand already has this exact shape, recognizing turns a hard-looking integral in into an easy one in .
Proof sketch
Define . By the chain rule, since , .
This says exactly that is differentiable with derivative at every in the domain — i.e. is, by definition, an antiderivative of .
By the uniqueness theorem above, every antiderivative of differs from by a constant, so , as claimed. In practice one writes , , reducing the left side to before substituting back at the end.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- James Stewart (2015). Calculus: Early Transcendentals
- Michael Spivak (2008). Calculus
- Manuel Bronstein (1998). Symbolic Integration Tutorial