MathLabs
TheoremProved

Reverse triangle inequality (proper-time maximization)

Statement

In Minkowski spacetime R1,3\mathbb R^{1,3}, let p,qp,q be two events connected by a straight timelike segment γ0\gamma_0 (an inertial worldline). For any other smooth future-directed timelike curve γ\gamma from pp to qq, the elapsed proper time τ=∫1−v(t)2/c2 dt\tau = \int \sqrt{1 - v(t)^2/c^2}\,dt satisfies τ(γ)≤τ(γ0)\tau(\gamma) \le \tau(\gamma_0), with equality if and only if γ\gamma coincides with γ0\gamma_0.

Why is it true?

In Euclidean geometry the straight line is the shortest path because moving sideways adds +dx2+dx^2 to the length; in Minkowski spacetime the spatial displacement enters with the opposite sign from −c2dt2-c^2dt^2, so any spatial detour subtracts from −ds2-ds^2 and therefore shrinks the integral of −ds2/c\sqrt{-ds^2}/c. That is the entire resolution of the twin paradox: the twin who stays in an inertial frame follows the straight worldline in spacetime and ages the most; the twin who flies away and turns back takes a bent worldline and ages less.

Proof sketch

**Step 1 (adapt the inertial frame to γ0\gamma_0).** Because γ0\gamma_0 is a straight timelike line, we can choose an inertial coordinate system (t,x,y,z)(t,x,y,z) in which γ0\gamma_0 sits at rest at the spatial origin: p=(0,0)p=(0,\mathbf 0), q=(T,0)q=(T,\mathbf 0) with T>0T>0, and γ0(t)=(t,0)\gamma_0(t)=(t,\mathbf 0) for t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T]. Since the metric ds2=−c2dt2+dx2+dy2+dz2ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 is invariant under Lorentz transformations, the proper time of any curve is the same in every inertial frame.

**Step 2 (compute τ(γ0)\tau(\gamma_0)).** Along γ0\gamma_0 the spatial velocity is v(t)=0\mathbf v(t)=\mathbf 0, so τ(γ0)=∫0T1−0/c2 dt=T.\tau(\gamma_0) = \int_0^T \sqrt{1 - 0/c^2}\,dt = T.

**Step 3 (parameterize the competing curve γ\gamma).** Any future-directed timelike curve γ\gamma from pp to qq has dt/dλ>0dt/d\lambda > 0 everywhere (since c2dt2>∣dx∣2≥0c^2 dt^2 > |d\mathbf x|^2 \ge 0), so we may parameterize it by the coordinate time t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T] as γ(t)=(t,x(t))\gamma(t)=(t,\mathbf x(t)) with x(0)=x(T)=0\mathbf x(0)=\mathbf x(T)=\mathbf 0 and velocity v(t)=dx/dt\mathbf v(t)=d\mathbf x/dt satisfying ∣v(t)∣<c|\mathbf v(t)|<c. Its elapsed proper time is τ=∫1−v(t)2/c2 dt\tau = \int \sqrt{1 - v(t)^2/c^2}\,dt over [0,T][0,T].

Step 4 (pointwise bound and equality case). For every t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], ∣v(t)∣2≥0|\mathbf v(t)|^2\ge0 implies 0<1−∣v(t)∣2/c2≤10 < \sqrt{1 - |\mathbf v(t)|^2/c^2} \le 1, with equality at a given tt if and only if v(t)=0\mathbf v(t)=\mathbf 0. Integrating over [0,T][0,T], τ(γ)=∫0T1−∣v(t)∣2c2 dt≤∫0T1 dt=T=τ(γ0).\tau(\gamma) = \int_0^T \sqrt{1 - \frac{|\mathbf v(t)|^2}{c^2}}\,dt \le \int_0^T 1\,dt = T = \tau(\gamma_0). Because the integrand is continuous and ≤1\le 1, equality τ(γ)=T\tau(\gamma)=T holds if and only if v(t)=0\mathbf v(t)=\mathbf 0 for all t∈[0,T]t\in[0,T], which together with x(0)=0\mathbf x(0)=\mathbf 0 forces x(t)≡0\mathbf x(t)\equiv\mathbf 0, i.e. γ=γ0\gamma=\gamma_0.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Robert M. Wald (1984). General Relativity · DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001
  2. Stephen W. Hawking, George F. R. Ellis (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time · DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511524646
  3. Demetrios Christodoulou, Sergiu Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space