MathLabs
TheoremProved

Maschke's Theorem

Statement

Let GG be a finite group and VV a representation over a field kk with char⁡(k)\operatorname{char}(k) not dividing ∣G∣|G| (in particular, always true over C\mathbb{C}). If W⊆VW \subseteq V is a GG-invariant subspace, then there is a GG-invariant complement W′W' with V=W⊕W′V = W \oplus W'. Consequently every such representation decomposes as a direct sum of irreducible representations.

Why is it true?

Linear algebra alone guarantees some complement to WW, but a generic complement will not be GG-invariant. Maschke's theorem shows we can always average an arbitrary projection over the group to force it to commute with the GG-action, at the cost of dividing by ∣G∣|G| — which is exactly why the theorem needs char⁡(k)∤∣G∣\operatorname{char}(k) \nmid |G|, and exactly why modular representation theory (where this division is impossible) behaves so differently.

Proof sketch

Step 1 (start with any complement). By ordinary linear algebra, choose any vector-space complement UU to WW in VV (not necessarily GG-invariant), and let π:V→W\pi: V \to W be the corresponding projection (π∣W=id\pi|_W = \mathrm{id}, ker⁡π=U\ker\pi = U).

Step 2 (average over the group). Define πˉ=1∣G∣∑g∈Gρ(g) π ρ(g)−1\bar\pi = \dfrac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g \in G} \rho(g)\, \pi\, \rho(g)^{-1}. This makes sense exactly because char⁡(k)∤∣G∣\operatorname{char}(k) \nmid |G|, so ∣G∣|G| is invertible in kk.

Step 3 (πˉ\bar\pi is still a projection onto WW). For w∈Ww \in W, since WW is GG-invariant, ρ(g)−1w∈W\rho(g)^{-1}w \in W, so π(ρ(g)−1w)=ρ(g)−1w\pi(\rho(g)^{-1}w) = \rho(g)^{-1}w, giving ρ(g)π(ρ(g)−1w)=w\rho(g)\pi(\rho(g)^{-1}w) = w for every term; averaging these ∣G∣|G| copies of ww gives πˉ(w)=w\bar\pi(w) = w. For general v∈Vv \in V, π(ρ(g)−1v)∈W\pi(\rho(g)^{-1}v) \in W always (image of π\pi), so ρ(g)π(ρ(g)−1v)∈ρ(g)W=W\rho(g)\pi(\rho(g)^{-1}v) \in \rho(g)W = W by invariance, and averaging stays in WW; hence πˉ:V→W\bar\pi: V \to W is a projection onto WW.

Step 4 (πˉ\bar\pi commutes with the action, so its kernel is GG-invariant). For any h∈Gh \in G, ρ(h)πˉρ(h)−1=1∣G∣∑gρ(hg)πρ(hg)−1=πˉ\rho(h)\bar\pi\rho(h)^{-1} = \dfrac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g} \rho(hg)\pi\rho(hg)^{-1} = \bar\pi since g↦hgg \mapsto hg merely permutes the sum; so ρ(h)πˉ=πˉρ(h)\rho(h)\bar\pi = \bar\pi\rho(h). Setting W′=ker⁡πˉW' = \ker\bar\pi, for v∈W′v \in W' we get πˉ(ρ(h)v)=ρ(h)πˉ(v)=ρ(h)(0)=0\bar\pi(\rho(h)v) = \rho(h)\bar\pi(v) = \rho(h)(0) = 0, so ρ(h)v∈W′\rho(h)v \in W': W′W' is GG-invariant, and V=W⊕W′V = W \oplus W' since πˉ\bar\pi is a projection onto WW. Iterating this splitting on W′W' (finite dimension forces termination) decomposes VV into a direct sum of irreducibles.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Jean-Pierre Serre (1977). Linear Representations of Finite Groups
  2. William Fulton, Joe Harris (1991). Representation Theory: A First Course
  3. Dennis Gaitsgory, Sam Raskin, et al. (2024). The Proof of the Geometric Langlands Conjecture · arXiv:2405.03599
  4. Gordon D. James (1978). The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups