Nash's existence theorem
Statement
Every finite normal-form game (any number of players , each with a finite pure-strategy set ) has at least one Nash equilibrium in mixed strategies.
Why is it true?
The proof builds a continuous "improve your strategy a little" map on the space of all strategy profiles: nudge probability toward any pure strategy currently doing better than average. Since the space of strategy profiles is compact and convex, Brouwer's fixed-point theorem guarantees this map has a fixed point — a profile that the map does not want to change. The proof's remaining work shows a fixed point is exactly a profile with no profitable deviation, i.e. a Nash equilibrium.
Proof sketch
Let , the product of the players' mixed-strategy simplices — a compact, convex subset of Euclidean space. For , player , and pure strategy , define the gain function , the payoff player would gain by switching entirely to pure strategy , or if that switch would not help. Define by ; since is continuous (indeed multilinear) in , is continuous, so is continuous, and each is again a probability vector by construction.
By Brouwer's fixed-point theorem, the continuous map on the compact convex set has a fixed point with . Write ; the fixed-point equation for each reads , i.e. .
Fix a player and let , so . Multiply the fixed-point equation by and sum over : on the left, , using and .
On the right, . Equating both sides, , a sum of squares equal to zero, so every term vanishes: there is no with . Since was arbitrary, for every player and every pure strategy — precisely the Nash equilibrium condition. Hence is a Nash equilibrium.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- John von Neumann, Oskar Morgenstern (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior
- John F. Nash Jr. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games · DOI:10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
- John F. Nash Jr. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games · DOI:10.2307/1969529
- Constantinos Daskalakis, Paul W. Goldberg, Christos H. Papadimitriou (2009). The Complexity of Computing a Nash Equilibrium · DOI:10.1137/070699652