MathLabs
TheoremProved

Global regularity in two dimensions (Ladyzhenskaya)

Statement

In two space dimensions, for every smooth divergence-free initial velocity with finite energy, the Navier–Stokes equations have a unique solution that stays smooth for all time — no blow-up ever occurs, in contrast with the open 3D case.

Why is it true?

Vorticity in 3D obeys ωt+u⋅∇ω=(ω⋅∇)u+νΔω\omega_t+u\cdot\nabla\omega=(\omega\cdot\nabla)u+\nu\Delta\omega, and the term (ω⋅∇)u(\omega\cdot\nabla)u can amplify vorticity through stretching. In 2D vorticity is a scalar perpendicular to the plane of motion, so that stretching term vanishes identically, leaving only transport and diffusion — nothing left to amplify it without bound.

Proof sketch

Write the vorticity (a scalar in 2D) as ω=∂xu2−∂yu1\omega=\partial_x u_2-\partial_y u_1 and substitute the momentum equation into ∂tω+u⋅∇ω\partial_t\omega+u\cdot\nabla\omega. Because uu is divergence-free and two-dimensional, direct computation shows every term coming from (u⋅∇)u(u\cdot\nabla)u that would stretch ω\omega cancels, leaving the transport-diffusion equation ωt+u⋅∇ω=νΔω\omega_t+u\cdot\nabla\omega=\nu\Delta\omega with no source term.

A transport-diffusion equation with no source obeys a maximum principle: along the trajectory X˙(t)=u(X(t),t)\dot X(t)=u(X(t),t) of a fluid particle, ddtω(X(t),t)=νΔω(X(t),t)\frac{d}{dt}\omega(X(t),t)=\nu\Delta\omega(X(t),t), and diffusion cannot increase a maximum or decrease a minimum. Hence ∥ω(⋅,t)∥L∞≤∥ω0∥L∞\|\omega(\cdot,t)\|_{L^\infty}\le\|\omega_0\|_{L^\infty} for all t≥0t\ge0: the vorticity never blows up.

Once vorticity is bounded uniformly in time, elliptic regularity applied to the stream function (recovering uu from ω\omega) bounds all spatial derivatives of uu in terms of ∥ω∥L∞\|\omega\|_{L^\infty}, so uu stays in every Sobolev space it started in.

Bootstrapping this argument — bounded vorticity gives bounded velocity gradients, which control higher derivatives through the equation itself — shows the solution remains smooth for all t>0t>0, with no finite-time blow-up possible; this is exactly the statement that fails to be known in three dimensions, where the vortex-stretching term (ω⋅∇)u(\omega\cdot\nabla)u is present.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Charles L. Fefferman (2000). Existence and Smoothness of the Navier-Stokes Equation (Millennium Prize Problem)
  2. Terence Tao (2016). Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation · arXiv:1402.0290
  3. L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, L. Nirenberg (1982). Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations