MathLabs
TheoremProved

Leray's global weak solutions (1934)

Statement

For any divergence-free initial velocity u0u_0 with finite kinetic energy, the 3D Navier–Stokes equations on the whole space have a global-in-time weak solution uu satisfying the energy inequality.

Why is it true?

Even though the nonlinear term makes the equations too hard to solve exactly, viscosity keeps steadily draining kinetic energy; that single quantitative fact is enough to build an approximate solution and pass to a limit, even without knowing whether the limit is unique or smooth.

Proof sketch

Approximate the equations by a Galerkin projection: pick the eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator as a basis, project the equations onto the span of the first nn of them, and solve the resulting finite-dimensional ODE system for an approximate solution unu_n; standard ODE theory gives existence on a short time interval.

Test the Galerkin equation against unu_n itself. The nonlinear and pressure terms drop out (they are orthogonal to unu_n once the divergence-free constraint is used), leaving the energy identity 12ddt∥un∥L22+ν∥∇un∥L22=0\frac{1}{2}\frac{d}{dt}\|u_n\|_{L^2}^{2}+\nu\|\nabla u_n\|_{L^2}^{2}=0. Integrating in time shows unu_n stays bounded in L∞(L2)∩L2(H1)L^{\infty}(L^2)\cap L^2(H^1) uniformly in nn, and in particular the short-time solution extends to all time.

These uniform bounds let us extract a subsequence of unu_n converging weakly-* in L∞(L2)L^{\infty}(L^2) and weakly in L2(H1)L^2(H^1) to some limit uu. The Aubin–Lions compactness lemma upgrades this to strong convergence in L2L^2 on bounded time-space regions, which is exactly what is needed to pass to the limit in the quadratic nonlinear term (un⋅∇)un→(u⋅∇)u(u_n\cdot\nabla)u_n\to(u\cdot\nabla)u.

Passing to the limit in the weak formulation of the Galerkin equations shows uu satisfies the Navier–Stokes equations in the sense of distributions, and the weak lower semicontinuity of the norm under the limit preserves the energy inequality. This uu is Leray's global weak solution; whether it is unique and smooth is exactly the open Millennium Prize question.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. Charles L. Fefferman (2000). Existence and Smoothness of the Navier-Stokes Equation (Millennium Prize Problem)
  2. Terence Tao (2016). Finite time blowup for an averaged three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation · arXiv:1402.0290
  3. L. Caffarelli, R. Kohn, L. Nirenberg (1982). Partial regularity of suitable weak solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations