Lyapunov's direct method (second method)
Statement
Suppose is continuously differentiable on a neighborhood of , with and for nearby. If along every trajectory near , then is stable; if instead for nearby, then is asymptotically stable — with no need to solve the equations or even linearize.
Why is it true?
Think of as a generalized energy: if energy never increases along trajectories and is zero only at , the system cannot wander away from , and if energy strictly decreases it must eventually settle at the only point where it is zero.
Proof sketch
Fix a small small enough that the closed ball lies in the domain where is defined and positive away from , and let be its boundary sphere. Since is continuous and strictly positive on the compact set , it attains a minimum .
By continuity of and , choose small enough that implies .
Because along trajectories, for every that the solution exists. Every point of has , so the trajectory can never reach ; by continuity of , it must remain strictly inside the ball of radius for all . This is exactly the definition of Lyapunov stability.
If in addition strictly for nearby, then is strictly decreasing and bounded below by , so it converges to some limit . If were positive, the trajectory would stay in the compact annulus where , on which attains a strictly negative maximum, forcing to decrease past in finite time — a contradiction. Hence , and since is positive-definite this forces : asymptotic stability.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Steven H. Strogatz (2015). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering
- Morris W. Hirsch, Stephen Smale, Robert L. Devaney (2013). Differential Equations, Dynamical Systems, and an Introduction to Chaos