TheoremProved
Prime number theorem
Statement
Let count the primes not exceeding . Then as , i.e. .
Why is it true?
Near a large number , a randomly chosen integer has roughly a chance of being prime — primes thin out logarithmically as numbers grow, not at any simpler rate such as polynomially.
Proof sketch
Connect to the complex-analytic behaviour of the Riemann zeta function via its Euler product over primes. The key analytic input, established independently by Hadamard and de la Vallée Poussin, is that has no zeros on the line . A Tauberian argument then converts this zero-free region into the asymptotic .
Stated by
Topics that use this theorem
Related theorems
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Jacques Hadamard (1896). Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction ζ(s) et ses conséquences arithmétiques
- Tom M. Apostol (1976). Introduction to Analytic Number Theory · DOI:10.1007/978-1-4757-5579-4