Law of quadratic reciprocity
Statement
For distinct odd primes and : .
Why is it true?
It says whether is a square mod and whether is a square mod are the same question, up to a sign that depends only on the residues of mod — turning a hard-looking two-variable problem into a one-line rule.
Proof sketch
We use Gauss's lemma as a stepping stone: for an odd prime and , look at the least positive residues of modulo , and let be how many of them exceed . Gauss's lemma states ; it follows from pairing each such "large" residue with and tracking signs when multiplying the numbers together in two different ways.
Eisenstein's refinement expresses as a lattice-point count: one shows when is odd, by comparing (the number of multiples of below ) to how far sits from . Applying the same counting argument symmetrically gives and , where and .
Geometrically, counts the lattice points with , lying strictly below the line (that count is ) plus those strictly above it (that count is , by the symmetric roles of ). No lattice point lies exactly on the line since and , so together these two counts exhaust the full rectangle of lattice points.
Therefore , and multiplying the two Legendre-symbol formulas gives , which is exactly .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Wikipedia contributors (2024). Quadratic reciprocity
- Kenneth Ireland, Michael Rosen (1990). A Classical Introduction to Modern Number Theory