Multiplication rule for independent sequential steps
Statement
Let a task consist of successive steps , where step can be performed in ways regardless of which choices were made in the earlier steps. Then the number of ways to carry out the whole sequence is .
Why is it true?
Because each step's number of choices does not depend on earlier steps, every combination of choices is a distinct legal outcome, and the count of combinations multiplies exactly like counting cells in a rectangular grid.
Proof sketch
Step 1 (base case ): with a single step there are trivially ways, matching the formula for .
Step 2 (base case ): for each of the ways to perform step 1, step 2 can still be done in ways, since its count does not depend on step 1's outcome. This splits all pairs of choices into disjoint groups of size (one group per outcome of step 1), so the addition rule gives a total of added to itself times, i.e. .
Step 3 (induction on ): assume the formula holds for steps, so the first steps together admit outcomes. Treat those steps as one combined "super-step" with outcomes, and step as a second, independent step with outcomes (its count still does not depend on earlier choices). Applying the two-step base case to this pair gives , which is . By induction the formula holds for every .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Richard A. Brualdi (2009). Introductory Combinatorics
- Kenneth H. Rosen (2019). Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications