MathLabs
TheoremProved

Discrete spectrum of the quantum harmonic oscillator

Statement

The Hamiltonian H^=P^22m+12mω2X^2\hat H=\dfrac{\hat P^2}{2m}+\dfrac12 m\omega^2\hat X^2, with [X^,P^]=iℏ[\hat X,\hat P]=i\hbar, has discrete, nondegenerate spectrum En=ℏω(n+12)E_n = \hbar\omega\left(n+\tfrac12\right), n=0,1,2,…n=0,1,2,\dots.

Why is it true?

Rather than solving a differential equation directly, factor the Hamiltonian algebraically into 'raising' and 'lowering' operators, exactly as one factors a quadratic form. Positivity of the resulting number operator, plus the algebra of how the ladder operators shift its eigenvalues by one unit, forces the eigenvalues to form an evenly spaced ladder starting at a nonnegative bottom rung — energy quantization falls out of algebra alone.

Proof sketch

Step 1 (ladder operators). Define a^=mω2ℏ(X^+imωP^)\hat a=\sqrt{\tfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat X+\tfrac{i}{m\omega}\hat P\right) and a^†=mω2ℏ(X^−imωP^)\hat a^\dagger=\sqrt{\tfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}}\left(\hat X-\tfrac{i}{m\omega}\hat P\right). Using [X^,P^]=iℏ[\hat X,\hat P]=i\hbar, a direct computation gives [a^,a^†]=mω2ℏ(−imω[X^,P^]+imω[P^,X^])=12ℏ(ℏ+ℏ)=1[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger]=\tfrac{m\omega}{2\hbar}\left(\tfrac{-i}{m\omega}[\hat X,\hat P]+\tfrac{i}{m\omega}[\hat P,\hat X]\right)=\tfrac{1}{2\hbar}\left(\hbar+\hbar\right)=1.

Step 2 (rewrite the Hamiltonian). Inverting, X^=ℏ2mω(a^+a^†)\hat X=\sqrt{\tfrac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(\hat a+\hat a^\dagger) and P^=imωℏ2(a^†−a^)\hat P=i\sqrt{\tfrac{m\omega\hbar}{2}}(\hat a^\dagger-\hat a); substituting into H^=P^22m+12mω2X^2\hat H=\tfrac{\hat P^2}{2m}+\tfrac12 m\omega^2\hat X^2 and using [a^,a^†]=1[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger]=1 to reorder terms gives H^=ℏω(a^†a^+12)\hat H=\hbar\omega\left(\hat a^\dagger\hat a+\tfrac12\right). Define the number operator N^=a^†a^\hat N=\hat a^\dagger\hat a; it is self-adjoint, and for any state ϕ\phi, ⟨ϕ∣N^∣ϕ⟩=∥a^ϕ∥2≥0\langle\phi|\hat N|\phi\rangle=\|\hat a\phi\|^2\ge0, so every eigenvalue nn of N^\hat N satisfies n≥0n\ge0.

Step 3 (ladder relations). From [a^,a^†]=1[\hat a,\hat a^\dagger]=1 one gets [N^,a^]=−a^[\hat N,\hat a]=-\hat a and [N^,a^†]=a^†[\hat N,\hat a^\dagger]=\hat a^\dagger. So if N^∣n⟩=n∣n⟩\hat N|n\rangle=n|n\rangle, then N^a^=a^N^−a^=a^(N^−1)\hat N\hat a=\hat a\hat N-\hat a=\hat a(\hat N-1), giving N^(a^∣n⟩)=(n−1)(a^∣n⟩)\hat N(\hat a|n\rangle)=(n-1)(\hat a|n\rangle): a^\hat a lowers the eigenvalue by 11 (or annihilates the state), and a^†\hat a^\dagger raises it by 11.

Step 4 (termination and the spectrum). Because N^≥0\hat N\ge0, repeatedly applying a^\hat a to any eigenstate cannot produce eigenvalues below 00; the descending chain n,n−1,n−2,…n,n-1,n-2,\dots must terminate at n=0n=0 (a non-integer starting value would force a negative eigenvalue after finitely many steps, a contradiction), so every eigenvalue of N^\hat N is a nonnegative integer, and the ground state ∣0⟩|0\rangle satisfies a^∣0⟩=0\hat a|0\rangle=0. Applying a^†\hat a^\dagger repeatedly to ∣0⟩|0\rangle produces normalizable eigenstates ∣n⟩∝(a^†)n∣0⟩|n\rangle\propto(\hat a^\dagger)^n|0\rangle for every n=0,1,2,…n=0,1,2,\dots, and no others exist. Substituting N^∣n⟩=n∣n⟩\hat N|n\rangle=n|n\rangle into H^=ℏω(N^+12)\hat H=\hbar\omega(\hat N+\tfrac12) gives En=ℏω(n+12)E_n = \hbar\omega\left(n+\tfrac12\right).

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. John von Neumann (1955). Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
  2. Howard P. Robertson (1929). The Uncertainty Principle · DOI:10.1103/PhysRev.34.163
  3. Marshall H. Stone (1932). On One-Parameter Unitary Groups in Hilbert Space · DOI:10.2307/1968538