MathLabs
TheoremProved

$\mathcal O_K$ is closed under addition and multiplication

Statement

In each of the two cases of Theorem 1, OK\mathcal O_K (as explicitly described there) is closed under addition and multiplication, so it is genuinely a subring of KK containing Z\mathbb Z.

Why is it true?

This is what justifies calling OK\mathcal O_K a ring of integers at all: without closure under multiplication in particular, one could not multiply two integers of KK and stay inside OK\mathcal O_K, which would make ring-theoretic arithmetic (factorization, ideals) impossible.

Proof sketch

Case d≡2,3(mod4)d\equiv2,3\pmod4 (OK=Z[d]\mathcal O_K=\mathbb Z[\sqrt d], i.e. all elements a+bda+b\sqrt d with a,b∈Za,b\in\mathbb Z): addition is componentwise, (a+bd)+(c+ed)=(a+c)+(b+e)d(a+b\sqrt d)+(c+e\sqrt d)=(a+c)+(b+e)\sqrt d, clearly again of this form. For multiplication, (a+bd)(c+ed)=(ac+bed)+(ae+bc)d(a+b\sqrt d)(c+e\sqrt d)=(ac+bed)+(ae+bc)\sqrt d, and since a,b,c,e,d∈Za,b,c,e,d\in\mathbb Z, both ac+bedac+bed and ae+bcae+bc are integers, so the product stays in Z[d]\mathbb Z[\sqrt d].

Case d≡1(mod4)d\equiv1\pmod4 (OK=Z[ω]\mathcal O_K=\mathbb Z[\omega] with ω=1+d2\omega=\tfrac{1+\sqrt d}2): first compute ω2\omega^2 directly. ω2=(1+d2)2=1+2d+d4=1+d4+d2\omega^2=\left(\tfrac{1+\sqrt d}2\right)^2=\tfrac{1+2\sqrt d+d}4=\tfrac{1+d}4+\tfrac{\sqrt d}2. Since d=2ω−1\sqrt d=2\omega-1, this is 1+d4+ω−12=d−14+ω\tfrac{1+d}4+\omega-\tfrac12=\tfrac{d-1}4+\omega. Because d≡1(mod4)d\equiv1\pmod4, t:=d−14t:=\tfrac{d-1}4 is an integer, so ω2=t+ω\omega^2=t+\omega: a genuine integer relation showing ω\omega satisfies the monic integer polynomial x2−x−tx^2-x-t, confirming ω\omega itself is integral (as it must be, matching Theorem 1), and crucially expressing ω2\omega^2 again as an integer combination of 11 and ω\omega.

Now take general elements a+bωa+b\omega and c+eωc+e\omega with a,b,c,e∈Za,b,c,e\in\mathbb Z; addition is again componentwise and clearly closed. For the product, (a+bω)(c+eω)=ac+(ae+bc)ω+be ω2=ac+(ae+bc)ω+be(t+ω)=(ac+bet)+(ae+bc+be)ω(a+b\omega)(c+e\omega)=ac+(ae+bc)\omega+be\,\omega^2=ac+(ae+bc)\omega+be(t+\omega)=(ac+bet)+(ae+bc+be)\omega. Both coefficients ac+betac+bet and ae+bc+beae+bc+be are integers (products and sums of integers), so the product lies in Z+Zω=Z[ω]\mathbb Z+\mathbb Z\omega=\mathbb Z[\omega].

In both cases, closure under addition and multiplication is verified by direct, elementary computation, confirming OK\mathcal O_K is genuinely a subring of KK containing Z\mathbb Z in every quadratic field, exactly as the name "ring of integers" promises.

Topics that use this theorem

Step-by-step proofs

No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.

References

  1. J. Neukirch (1999). Algebraic Number Theory · DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0
  2. M. Bhargava (2005). The density of discriminants of quartic rings and fields · DOI:10.4007/annals.2005.162.1031
  3. The LMFDB Collaboration (2026). The L-functions and modular forms database (LMFDB)