$\mathcal O_K$ is closed under addition and multiplication
Statement
In each of the two cases of Theorem 1, (as explicitly described there) is closed under addition and multiplication, so it is genuinely a subring of containing .
Why is it true?
This is what justifies calling a ring of integers at all: without closure under multiplication in particular, one could not multiply two integers of and stay inside , which would make ring-theoretic arithmetic (factorization, ideals) impossible.
Proof sketch
Case (, i.e. all elements with ): addition is componentwise, , clearly again of this form. For multiplication, , and since , both and are integers, so the product stays in .
Case ( with ): first compute directly. . Since , this is . Because , is an integer, so : a genuine integer relation showing satisfies the monic integer polynomial , confirming itself is integral (as it must be, matching Theorem 1), and crucially expressing again as an integer combination of and .
Now take general elements and with ; addition is again componentwise and clearly closed. For the product, . Both coefficients and are integers (products and sums of integers), so the product lies in .
In both cases, closure under addition and multiplication is verified by direct, elementary computation, confirming is genuinely a subring of containing in every quadratic field, exactly as the name "ring of integers" promises.
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- J. Neukirch (1999). Algebraic Number Theory · DOI:10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0
- M. Bhargava (2005). The density of discriminants of quartic rings and fields · DOI:10.4007/annals.2005.162.1031
- The LMFDB Collaboration (2026). The L-functions and modular forms database (LMFDB)