Grade 10
Permutations, arrangements and combinations
Counting formulas , , for ordered and unordered selections.
IntuitionIntuition: does order matter?
Take 3 colored beads and put them in a row: swapping two beads gives a visibly different row, so order matters — that is a permutation. Now put the same 3 beads into a bag: shaking the bag does not create a new bag, so order does not matter — that is a combination. Between these two extremes sits the arrangement: picking and ordering only some of the objects, like awarding gold, silver and bronze medals to 3 out of many runners. The three counting formulas below — permutation, arrangement, combination — are simply the multiplication rule applied to these three situations.
SchoolThree counting formulas
Definition: Permutation
A permutation of distinct objects is an ordering of all of them in a row. The number of permutations is written .
Definition: Arrangement (partial permutation)
An arrangement of objects chosen from distinct objects () is a way of choosing of them and lining them up in order. The number of arrangements is written .
Definition: Combination
A combination of objects chosen from distinct objects () is a way of choosing of them with no regard to order — just a subset. The number of combinations is written .
Every combination corresponds to exactly arrangements (one for each ordering of the chosen subset), which is exactly why the combination formula divides the arrangement count by .
| Concept | Order matters? | Chosen amount | Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permutation | Yes | all | |
| Arrangement | Yes | out of | |
| Combination | No | out of |
UndergraduateRigorous statement and proofs
For integers and , the number of ways to choose objects out of distinct objects and arrange them in order is . In particular, taking gives the number of permutations .
Why is it true?
Filling k ordered slots one at a time, with the pool of remaining eligible objects shrinking by one after every slot, is exactly the setting of the multiplication rule for independent sequential steps.
Proof
Step 1 (set up the positions): label the positions to be filled, in order, as position 1 through position . Filling each position with one of the objects, without reusing an object already placed, is a task made of successive steps.
Step 2 (apply the multiplication rule): position 1 can be filled in ways. Once it is filled, one object has been used, so position 2 can be filled in ways, regardless of which object filled position 1. Continuing this way, position can be filled in ways, since objects have already been used. By the multiplication rule, the total count is the product .
Step 3 (rewrite as a factorial quotient): multiplying and dividing by the missing tail gives , which is exactly .
Step 4 (special case ): substituting gives using , which recovers the permutation count .
For integers and , the number of ways to choose objects out of distinct objects with no regard to order is .
Why is it true?
Every unordered subset of size k can be turned into an ordered arrangement in exactly k! ways, so the ordered count over-counts each subset by the same factor k!; dividing removes the over-counting.
Proof
Step 1 (group arrangements by their underlying subset): every arrangement of objects out of first selects some -element subset and then orders it. Group the arrangements into buckets, one bucket per possible -element subset, so that two arrangements land in the same bucket exactly when they use the same set of objects.
Step 2 (size of each bucket): fixing one -element subset, the arrangements built from it correspond exactly to the orderings of that subset, and there are such orderings (a permutation of objects). So every bucket has exactly arrangements.
Step 3 (addition rule across buckets): the buckets are disjoint (an arrangement belongs to exactly one bucket) and there are buckets by definition, each of size . The addition rule ( added to itself times) gives .
Step 4 (solve for the combination count): dividing both sides by and substituting gives , that is .
For integers and with , .
Why is it true?
This is the addition rule in disguise: splitting all size-k subsets by whether or not they contain one fixed element gives two disjoint cases whose counts add up.
Proof
Step 1 (fix one element and split by membership): fix one object among the objects. Every -element subset either contains or does not; these two cases are disjoint and together cover all subsets.
Step 2 (count subsets containing x): a subset containing is formed by choosing the remaining elements from the other objects, giving such subsets.
Step 3 (count subsets not containing x): a subset avoiding is formed by choosing all elements from the remaining objects, giving such subsets.
Step 4 (apply the addition rule): since the two cases are disjoint and exhaust all size-k subsets, the addition rule gives .
UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples
Permutations, arrangements and combinations are the everyday arithmetic of computer science (counting possible orderings in sorting algorithms), cryptography (counting keys), scheduling (assigning distinct time slots), and statistics (counting equally likely samples before computing a probability). The two examples below show a permutation problem and a combination problem side by side.
Example: Arranging books on a shelf
A student has 5 distinct textbooks and wants to line all of them up on a shelf, one next to another. How many different orderings are possible?
Solution
Step 1: all 5 books are placed, and swapping any two books gives a visibly different shelf, so this is a permutation of all 5 objects, not just a partial selection.
Step 2: fill the 5 positions on the shelf one at a time: the first position has choices, the second has remaining, and so on down to the last position with choice, matching the permutation formula with .
Step 3: computing, different orderings.
Example: Choosing a committee
From a group of 10 employees, a committee of 4 people is to be chosen, with no distinct roles inside the committee (every member has equal standing). How many different committees are possible?
Solution
Step 1: since no member has a distinct role, two selections with the same 4 people but listed in a different order form the same committee, so order does not matter — this calls for the combination formula, not the arrangement formula.
Step 2: apply with and , giving .
Step 3: simplifying, the surviving factors are different committees.
In how many different orders can 4 distinct books be lined up on a shelf?
From 8 candidates, a president, a vice-president and a secretary (three distinct roles, no one holding two roles) are chosen. How many different outcomes are possible?
From 9 volunteers, a group of 3 people (all with equal standing, no distinct roles) is chosen to run an event. How many different groups are possible?
A teacher picks 2 students from a class of 20 to form a duo that will share one prize together (no leader, no distinct positions between the two). Which formula counts the number of possible duos?
References
- Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, Oren Patashnik (1994). Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science
- Richard A. Brualdi (2009). Introductory Combinatorics