Pascal's identity
Statement
For integers and with , .
Why is it true?
This is the addition rule in disguise: splitting all size-k subsets by whether or not they contain one fixed element gives two disjoint cases whose counts add up.
Proof sketch
Step 1 (fix one element and split by membership): fix one object among the objects. Every -element subset either contains or does not; these two cases are disjoint and together cover all subsets.
Step 2 (count subsets containing x): a subset containing is formed by choosing the remaining elements from the other objects, giving such subsets.
Step 3 (count subsets not containing x): a subset avoiding is formed by choosing all elements from the remaining objects, giving such subsets.
Step 4 (apply the addition rule): since the two cases are disjoint and exhaust all size-k subsets, the addition rule gives .
Topics that use this theorem
Step-by-step proofs
No step-by-step proof yet for this theorem.
References
- Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth, Oren Patashnik (1994). Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science
- Richard A. Brualdi (2009). Introductory Combinatorics