MathLabs

Grade 6

Fractions and decimals

Numbers written as ratios of integers or in decimal (base-10) place-value form.

IntuitionSplitting a whole into equal parts

Cut a pizza into 88 equal slices and take 55 of them: you have 58\dfrac{5}{8} of the pizza. The same amount can be written as a decimal, 0.6250.625, by expressing it in tenths, hundredths, thousandths instead of eighths. Fractions and decimals are two notations for exactly the same numbers — the ratio-of-integers notation ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} and the base-1010 place-value notation.

Unit circle with a draggable angle marker illustrating a fraction of a full turn
Drag the angle θ\theta around the circle: at θ=90∘\theta=90^\circ the marker has swept exactly 90360=14\dfrac{90}{360}=\dfrac{1}{4} of a full turn — the fraction 14\frac14 written as the decimal 0.250.25. In general, sweeping θ\theta degrees covers the fraction θ360\dfrac{\theta}{360} of the circle.

SchoolDefinitions and standard notation

Definition: Fraction

A fraction ab\frac{a}{b} (with a,ba,b integers, b≠0b\neq0) represents aa copies of the unit 1b\frac1b, i.e. one part out of bb equal parts. aa is the numerator, bb is the denominator.

ab=cd  ⟺  ad=bc(b,d≠0)\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} \iff ad=bc \qquad (b,d\neq0)

This is the cross-multiplication rule: two fractions ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} are equal exactly when ad=bcad=bc. It turns the question "are these two fractions equal?" into an integer equation with no division involved.

ab+cd=ad+bcbd(b,d≠0)\dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{c}{d}=\dfrac{ad+bc}{bd} \qquad (b,d\neq0)

To add fractions ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d}-style, put them over a common denominator bdbd: ab+cd=ad+bcbd\dfrac{a}{b}+\dfrac{c}{d}=\dfrac{ad+bc}{bd}. The numerators adad and bcbc are what each original numerator becomes after scaling both fraction to the same denominator bdbd.

Which denominators give terminating decimals?
Fraction in lowest termsPrime factors of denominatorDecimal typeDecimal value
34\frac34222^2terminating0.750.75
58\dfrac{5}{8}8=238=2^3terminating0.6250.625
720\frac{7}{20}22⋅52^2\cdot5terminating0.350.35
13\dfrac{1}{3}33repeating0.333…0.333\ldots
56\frac562⋅32\cdot3repeating0.83‾0.8\overline{3}
17\dfrac{1}{7}77repeating0.142857142857…0.142857142857\ldots

UndergraduateTwo foundational theorems

For integers a,ca,c and nonzero integers b,db,d: ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} if and only if ad=bcad=bc.

Why is it true?

Comparing two fractions directly is awkward because they may be written with different denominators; multiplying through by both denominators clears the fractions and turns the comparison into an ordinary integer equation.

Proof

Direction 1 (⇒\Rightarrow). Suppose ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d}. Since b,d≠0b,d\neq0, we may multiply both sides by the nonzero number bdbd: ab⋅bd=cd⋅bd\frac{a}{b}\cdot bd = \frac{c}{d}\cdot bd. On the left, ab⋅bd=a⋅d\frac{a}{b}\cdot bd = a\cdot d because the factor bb cancels; on the right, cd⋅bd=c⋅b\frac{c}{d}\cdot bd = c\cdot b because the factor dd cancels. So ad=bcad=bc.

Direction 2 (⇐\Leftarrow). Suppose ad=bcad=bc. Divide both sides by the nonzero number bdbd: adbd=bcbd\dfrac{ad}{bd}=\dfrac{bc}{bd}. Cancel the common factor dd from the left fraction and the common factor bb from the right fraction: ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d}.

Both directions hold, so the two statements are equivalent: ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} exactly when ad=bcad=bc.

Let ab\frac{a}{b} be a fraction in lowest terms with b>0b>0 (so gcd⁡(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b)=1). Its decimal expansion terminates (has finitely many nonzero digits) if and only if b=2m5nb=2^m5^n for some integers m,n≥0m,n\ge0.

Why is it true?

Decimal place value is built from powers of 10=2×510=2\times5. A fraction can be rewritten with a denominator that is a power of 1010 exactly when its denominator's only prime factors are 22 and 55 — any other prime factor can never be "absorbed" into a power of 1010.

Proof

(⇐\Leftarrow) Suppose b=2m5nb=2^m5^n. Let k=max⁡(m,n)k=\max(m,n). Multiply numerator and denominator by 2k−n5k−m2^{k-n}5^{k-m} (both exponents are ≥0\ge0 since kk is the max): ab=a⋅2k−n5k−m2m5n⋅2k−n5k−m=a⋅2k−n5k−m2k5k=N10k\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{a\cdot2^{k-n}5^{k-m}}{2^m5^n\cdot2^{k-n}5^{k-m}}=\dfrac{a\cdot2^{k-n}5^{k-m}}{2^k5^k}=\dfrac{N}{10^k}, where N=a⋅2k−n5k−mN=a\cdot2^{k-n}5^{k-m} is an integer. Writing NN in ordinary digits and placing the decimal point kk digits from the right (padding with leading zeros if NN has fewer than kk digits) gives exactly the decimal expansion of ab\frac{a}{b}, and it stops after at most kk digits: it terminates.

(⇒\Rightarrow) Suppose ab\frac{a}{b} terminates after kk decimal digits, i.e. ab=N10k\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{N}{10^k} for some integer NN. Cross-multiplying (Theorem 1 above): a⋅10k=b⋅Na\cdot10^k = b\cdot N, so bb divides a⋅10ka\cdot10^k. Because ab\frac{a}{b} is in lowest terms, gcd⁡(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b)=1, meaning bb shares no prime factor with aa; hence any prime factor pp of bb cannot divide aa, and since pp divides a⋅10ka\cdot10^k it must divide 10k10^k instead. But 10k=2k5k10^k=2^k5^k, whose only prime factors are 22 and 55. So every prime factor of bb is 22 or 55, which means b=2m5nb=2^m5^n for some m,n≥0m,n\ge0.

UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples

Engineers translate fractional blueprint measurements into decimal form for machine tools; historical financial markets quoted prices in fractions chosen precisely because they always terminate as decimals; and everyday recipe scaling relies on the same addition rule.

Example: Machining a blueprint dimension

A blueprint specifies a bracket length of 453845\dfrac{3}{8} inches (forty-five and 58\dfrac{5}{8} inches), but the CNC (computer numerical control) milling machine only accepts decimal input. What decimal value should the machinist enter?

Solution

Step 1. Isolate the fractional part 58\dfrac{5}{8} and check it will terminate: its denominator 8=238=2^3 has only the prime factor 22, so by the theorem above 58\dfrac{5}{8} terminates as a decimal.

Step 2. Convert 58\dfrac{5}{8} to a power of 1010 in the denominator: multiply numerator and denominator by 125=53125=5^3 to get 5⋅1258⋅125=6251000\frac{5\cdot125}{8\cdot125}=\frac{625}{1000}, which is exactly 0.6250.625.

Step 3. Add the whole-number part: 45+0.625=45.62545+0.625=45.625. The machinist enters 45.62545.625 inches into the CNC controller — an exact value with no rounding error, guaranteed by 88 having only 22 as a prime factor.

Example: Stock prices before decimalization

Before the year 20012001, the New York Stock Exchange quoted share prices in fractions of a dollar — halves, quarters, eighths, and sixteenths — instead of cents. A share is quoted at 453845\dfrac{3}{8} dollars. Convert this to decimal dollars, and explain why the exchange could always convert such quotes exactly, without rounding.

Solution

Step 1. Convert the fractional part exactly as in the previous example: 58=0.625\dfrac{5}{8}=0.625, so the price is 45+0.625=45.37545+0.625=45.375 dollars.

Step 2. Explain the exactness. The exchange only ever used denominators from the sequence 2,4,8,16,32,…2,4,8,16,32,\ldots, i.e. powers of 22. By the theorem proved above, any fraction whose denominator's only prime factor is 22 (a special case of b=2m5nb=2^m5^n with n=0n=0) has a terminating decimal expansion, so converting fractional dollar quotes to decimal cents never loses precision.

Step 3. Contrast with a denominator outside that family: if prices had instead been quoted in thirds of a dollar (denominator 33), converting to decimal would never terminate — this is precisely why the historical fractional system was restricted to powers of 22, and precisely why the U.S. SEC's 20012001 decimalization to cents (denominator 100=22⋅52100=2^2\cdot5^2) also stayed exact.

Simplify 1824\dfrac{18}{24} to lowest terms.

Which of these fractions has a terminating decimal expansion?

The cross-multiplication rule says ab=cd\dfrac{a}{b}=\dfrac{c}{d} is equivalent to which equation?

Before 2001, a share was quoted at 453845\dfrac{3}{8} dollars. What is this in decimal dollars?

References

  1. David M. Burton (2010). Elementary Number Theory
  2. John H. Conway, Richard K. Guy (1996). The Book of Numbers · DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-4072-3