Grade 6
Fractions and decimals
Numbers written as ratios of integers or in decimal (base-10) place-value form.
IntuitionSplitting a whole into equal parts
Cut a pizza into equal slices and take of them: you have of the pizza. The same amount can be written as a decimal, , by expressing it in tenths, hundredths, thousandths instead of eighths. Fractions and decimals are two notations for exactly the same numbers — the ratio-of-integers notation and the base- place-value notation.
SchoolDefinitions and standard notation
Definition: Fraction
A fraction (with integers, ) represents copies of the unit , i.e. one part out of equal parts. is the numerator, is the denominator.
This is the cross-multiplication rule: two fractions are equal exactly when . It turns the question "are these two fractions equal?" into an integer equation with no division involved.
To add fractions -style, put them over a common denominator : . The numerators and are what each original numerator becomes after scaling both fraction to the same denominator .
| Fraction in lowest terms | Prime factors of denominator | Decimal type | Decimal value |
|---|---|---|---|
| terminating | |||
| terminating | |||
| terminating | |||
| repeating | |||
| repeating | |||
| repeating |
UndergraduateTwo foundational theorems
For integers and nonzero integers : if and only if .
Why is it true?
Comparing two fractions directly is awkward because they may be written with different denominators; multiplying through by both denominators clears the fractions and turns the comparison into an ordinary integer equation.
Proof
Direction 1 (). Suppose . Since , we may multiply both sides by the nonzero number : . On the left, because the factor cancels; on the right, because the factor cancels. So .
Direction 2 (). Suppose . Divide both sides by the nonzero number : . Cancel the common factor from the left fraction and the common factor from the right fraction: .
Both directions hold, so the two statements are equivalent: exactly when .
Let be a fraction in lowest terms with (so ). Its decimal expansion terminates (has finitely many nonzero digits) if and only if for some integers .
Why is it true?
Decimal place value is built from powers of . A fraction can be rewritten with a denominator that is a power of exactly when its denominator's only prime factors are and — any other prime factor can never be "absorbed" into a power of .
Proof
() Suppose . Let . Multiply numerator and denominator by (both exponents are since is the max): , where is an integer. Writing in ordinary digits and placing the decimal point digits from the right (padding with leading zeros if has fewer than digits) gives exactly the decimal expansion of , and it stops after at most digits: it terminates.
() Suppose terminates after decimal digits, i.e. for some integer . Cross-multiplying (Theorem 1 above): , so divides . Because is in lowest terms, , meaning shares no prime factor with ; hence any prime factor of cannot divide , and since divides it must divide instead. But , whose only prime factors are and . So every prime factor of is or , which means for some .
UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples
Engineers translate fractional blueprint measurements into decimal form for machine tools; historical financial markets quoted prices in fractions chosen precisely because they always terminate as decimals; and everyday recipe scaling relies on the same addition rule.
Example: Machining a blueprint dimension
A blueprint specifies a bracket length of inches (forty-five and inches), but the CNC (computer numerical control) milling machine only accepts decimal input. What decimal value should the machinist enter?
Solution
Step 1. Isolate the fractional part and check it will terminate: its denominator has only the prime factor , so by the theorem above terminates as a decimal.
Step 2. Convert to a power of in the denominator: multiply numerator and denominator by to get , which is exactly .
Step 3. Add the whole-number part: . The machinist enters inches into the CNC controller — an exact value with no rounding error, guaranteed by having only as a prime factor.
Example: Stock prices before decimalization
Before the year , the New York Stock Exchange quoted share prices in fractions of a dollar — halves, quarters, eighths, and sixteenths — instead of cents. A share is quoted at dollars. Convert this to decimal dollars, and explain why the exchange could always convert such quotes exactly, without rounding.
Solution
Step 1. Convert the fractional part exactly as in the previous example: , so the price is dollars.
Step 2. Explain the exactness. The exchange only ever used denominators from the sequence , i.e. powers of . By the theorem proved above, any fraction whose denominator's only prime factor is (a special case of with ) has a terminating decimal expansion, so converting fractional dollar quotes to decimal cents never loses precision.
Step 3. Contrast with a denominator outside that family: if prices had instead been quoted in thirds of a dollar (denominator ), converting to decimal would never terminate — this is precisely why the historical fractional system was restricted to powers of , and precisely why the U.S. SEC's decimalization to cents (denominator ) also stayed exact.
Simplify to lowest terms.
Which of these fractions has a terminating decimal expansion?
The cross-multiplication rule says is equivalent to which equation?
Before 2001, a share was quoted at dollars. What is this in decimal dollars?
References
- David M. Burton (2010). Elementary Number Theory
- John H. Conway, Richard K. Guy (1996). The Book of Numbers · DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-4072-3