Math Labs

Grade 8

Linear equations

Equations where the unknown appears only to the first power, solved by isolating the variable.

IntuitionA balance scale with one unknown weight

Picture a two-pan balance scale that is level. On one side sits an unknown weight xx plus some known weights; on the other side sit only known weights. Whatever you do to one pan — add, remove, or split weights equally — you must do to the other pan too, or the scale tips. Solving ax+b=0ax+b=0 is exactly this game: you add, subtract, multiply or divide both sides by the same quantity until only xx remains alone on one side. That single surviving value is the unknown's true weight.

A line y=x−2 crosses the horizontal axis at its root x=2; slope and intercept controls change the crossing.
The line y=x−2y=x-2 has its root at x=2x=2, where it crosses y=0y=0. For the plotted line form y=ax+cy=ax+c, the root is x=−c/ax=-c/a; changing the slope aa or intercept cc moves that crossing.

Definition: Linear equation in one unknown

A linear equation in one unknown xx is an equation that can be written in the standard form ax+b=0ax+b=0, where aa and bb are given numbers (coefficients) and a≠0a\neq0. The condition a≠0a\neq0 is essential: without it, xx would vanish from the equation entirely.

ax+b=0ax+b=0

Two moves keep the balance scale level. Transposition: move a term to the other side by flipping its sign (adding −b-b to both sides turns ax+b=0ax+b=0 into ax=−bax=-b). Scaling: divide both sides by the same nonzero number (dividing ax=−bax=-b by aa, allowed exactly because a≠0a\neq0, gives x=−bax=-\dfrac{b}{a}).

x=−bax=-\dfrac{b}{a}
The two cases hiding behind the coefficient a
ConditionEquation becomesNumber of solutions
a≠0ax+b=0ax+b=0Exactly one: x=−bax=-\dfrac{b}{a}
a=0, b=00⋅x+b=00\cdot x+b=0Infinitely many (any x works)
a=0, b≠00⋅x+b=00\cdot x+b=0None (no x works)

UndergraduateTwo key theorems

If a≠0a\neq0, the equation ax+b=0ax+b=0 has exactly one solution, namely x=−bax=-\dfrac{b}{a}.

Why is it true?

This is what lets us call the equation "linear": one unknown, one clean answer, never two, never none, as long as a is not zero.

Proof

Existence. Starting from ax+b=0ax+b=0, add −b-b to both sides: this does not change the balance, and gives ax=−bax=-b. Since a≠0a\neq0, we may divide both sides by aa: this too preserves the balance, and gives x=−bax=-\dfrac{b}{a}. Substituting this value back, a(−ba)+b=−b+b=0a\left(-\dfrac{b}{a}\right)+b=-b+b=0, so it genuinely satisfies the equation — a solution exists.

Uniqueness. Suppose x1x_1 and x2x_2 are both solutions, so ax1+b=0ax_1+b=0 and ax2+b=0ax_2+b=0. Subtracting the two equations eliminates bb: ax1−ax2=0a x_1 - a x_2 = 0, i.e. a(x1−x2)=0a(x_1-x_2)=0. Because a≠0a\neq0, the only way a product of two numbers is zero is if the other factor is zero, so x1−x2=0x_1-x_2=0, i.e. x1=x2x_1=x_2. Hence no two different numbers can both solve the equation: the solution found above is the only one.

If a=0a=0, the equation ax+b=0ax+b=0 reduces to b=0b=0: it has infinitely many solutions (every real x works) when b=0b=0 is a true statement, and no solution at all when b≠0b\neq0.

Why is it true?

This shows the label "linear equation" secretly depends on the coefficient of x being nonzero — drop that, and the whole notion of "one unique answer" collapses into either every answer or no answer.

Proof

Substitute a=0a=0 directly into ax+b=0ax+b=0: the term axax becomes 0⋅x=00\cdot x=0 for every real number xx, since any number times zero is zero. So the equation literally becomes b=0b=0, a statement about bb alone that no longer mentions xx at all.

Now there are exactly two possibilities for the fixed number bb. If b=0b=0, the leftover statement "0=00=0" is true regardless of which xx we substituted — so every real number xx satisfies the original equation, giving infinitely many solutions. If instead b≠0b\neq0, the leftover statement "b=0b=0" is simply false — no value of xx can make a false numerical statement true, so the equation has no solution whatsoever, no matter what xx we try.

UndergraduateReal-World Applications and Worked Examples

Linear equations are the workhorse of quick quantitative reasoning: whenever a quantity changes at a constant rate from a fixed starting point, finding "when" or "how many" boils down to isolating x in an equation of this form. Engineers convert units, businesses locate break-even points, and everyday apps compute fares this way.

Example: Finance — the break-even point

A workshop's cost to produce xx units is 5x+20005x+2000 dollars; selling all xx units brings in revenue 13x13x dollars. How many units must be produced and sold to exactly break even (cost equals revenue)?

Solution

Step 1 (Set cost equal to revenue). Break-even means cost and revenue are equal, so we write 5x+2000=13x5x+2000=13x. This is a linear equation with xx appearing only once its terms are combined.

Step 2 (Isolate x). Subtract 5x5x from both sides: 2000=8x2000=8x, then divide both sides by 88: x=250x=250. So the workshop must produce and sell 250250 units to break even; beyond that quantity, revenue exceeds cost and the workshop turns a profit.

Example: Physics — temperature conversion

A patient's temperature reads 98.6°F98.6\degree\mathrm{F} on a Fahrenheit thermometer. Using the conversion 95C+32=98.6\dfrac{9}{5}C+32=98.6, find the equivalent temperature CC in degrees Celsius.

Solution

Step 1 (Isolate the term with C). From 95C+32=98.6\dfrac{9}{5}C+32=98.6, subtract 3232 from both sides: 95C=66.6\dfrac{9}{5}C=66.6.

Step 2 (Undo the coefficient). Multiply both sides by 59\dfrac{5}{9} (the reciprocal of 95\dfrac{9}{5}), which is the same move as dividing by 95\dfrac{9}{5}: C=37C=37. A Fahrenheit reading of 98.6°98.6\degree is exactly normal human body temperature, 37°C37\degree\mathrm{C}.

Solve 2x+5=132x+5=13 for x.

Which of these equations has no solution?

A vendor's cost is 4x+3004x+300 and revenue is 10x10x. How many units x give break-even?

What condition on a is required so that ax+b=0ax+b=0 always has exactly one solution?