MathLabs

Worked solution: Kahn–Kalai's disproof of Borsuk's conjecture via the Frankl–Wilson theorem

Step 6 of 7: Explicit counterexamples: from n=1,325n = 1{,}325 down to n=63n = 63
In plain words

The argument above only guarantees a counterexample once dd is astronomically large; turning it into one specific, checkable dimension took real work choosing the smallest prime power kk that makes the arithmetic go through. Once the door was open, other mathematicians spent the following decades hunting for cleverer, hand-built or computer-verified configurations that push the failure of Borsuk's conjecture down into dimensions small enough to write out explicitly.

n=1325  (Kahn–Kalai),n=65  (Bondarenko),n=64  (Jenrich–Brouwer),n=63  (Ji)n = 1325 \;(\text{Kahn–Kalai}), \quad n = 65\;(\text{Bondarenko}), \quad n = 64\;(\text{Jenrich–Brouwer}), \quad n=63\;(\text{Ji})
Detailed analysis

Kahn and Kalai's original 1993 argument gave an explicit counterexample only for n=1,325n = 1{,}325 (and all n>2,014n > 2{,}014). Subsequent constructions steadily lowered the dimension: Andriy V. Bondarenko (2013) used two-distance sets built from strongly regular graphs to find a counterexample in R65\mathbb{R}^{65}, Thomas Jenrich and Andries E. Brouwer (2014) found a rigorously verified 352352-point counterexample in R64\mathbb{R}^{64}, and a 2026 preprint by Yibo Ji verifies an AI-generated 321321-point counterexample in R63\mathbb{R}^{63}, not yet peer-reviewed.

Knowledge used in this step