MathLabs

Worked solution: Mihăilescu's proof of Catalan's conjecture via cyclotomic fields (2002)

Step 7 of 7: Closing the loop: Catalan's conjecture is a theorem
In plain words

Putting all the pieces together: any hypothetical counterexample to Catalan's conjecture would, after the reduction of Step 1, give odd primes p,qp,q and nonzero integers x,yx,y solving xp−yq=1x^p-y^q=1. Step 2's relations, Step 3's effective bound, Step 4's Wieferich congruences, Step 5's exclusion of p≡1(modq)p\equiv1\pmod q, and Step 6's Thaine-theorem elimination together show this is impossible for every possible (p,q)(p,q) — with no exceptions and no remaining cases.

So the only solution to xu−yv=1x^u-y^v=1 in integers greater than 11 is exactly the one Catalan spotted in 1844: 32−23=13^2-2^3=1, i.e. 88 and 99 really are the only consecutive perfect powers. What began as an offhand remark in a letter to a journal editor took 158 years, and ultimately the deep arithmetic of cyclotomic fields, to settle.

32−23=13^2 - 2^3 = 1
Detailed analysis

Assembling Steps 1–6: suppose, for contradiction, that Catalan's equation xp−yq=1x^p-y^q=1 has a solution in nonzero integers x,yx,y and odd primes p,qp,q. By Step 2, q∣xq\mid x, p∣yp\mid y, and x,yx,y satisfy Cassels' explicit factorizations. By Step 3, p,qp,q (and hence x,yx,y) are bounded by an effective, if enormous, constant. By Step 4, (p,q)(p,q) must be a double Wieferich pair; by Step 5, additionally p≢1(modq)p\not\equiv1\pmod q and q≢1(modp)q\not\equiv1\pmod p. Step 6's module-theoretic argument, via Thaine's theorem, then shows that no pair (p,q)(p,q) satisfying all of the above can actually occur — the module MM built from the hypothetical solution is forced to be simultaneously nonzero (since x,y,p,qx,y,p,q are all nontrivial) and zero (by the annihilator computation), a contradiction (Bilu 2004, §6–9, culminating in the proof of Theorem 1.3).

Therefore Catalan's equation xp−yq=1x^p-y^q=1 has no solution at all in nonzero integers and odd primes p,qp,q — this is Mihăilescu's Theorem 1.3, first announced in 2002 and published with full details in Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle's journal) in 2004. Combined with Lebesgue's theorem (v=2v=2 case) and Ko Chao's theorem (u=2u=2 case) from Step 1, this establishes the original 1844 conjecture in full: xu−yv=1x^u-y^v=1 has exactly one solution in integers x,y,u,v>1x,y,u,v>1, namely 32−23=13^2-2^3=1.

Catalan's conjecture — one of the longest-standing named conjectures in number theory to be resolved by a single mathematician's proof — is now properly called Mihăilescu's theorem.