MathLabs

Worked solution: Tao's proof of the Erdős discrepancy problem via logarithmically averaged correlations (2015)

Step 1 of 9: The Erdős discrepancy problem: no ±1\pm 1 sequence stays balanced forever
In plain words

Imagine an infinite sequence of +1+1 and −1-1 coin-flip results, written down once and for all. You are allowed to pick any "skip" length dd and then add up the first nn results you get by looking only at positions d,2d,3d,…d,2d,3d,\ldots — like reading every dd-th entry in a long list. Erdős asked in the 1930s whether it is possible to write down the sequence so cleverly that no matter which skip dd you choose and how far nn you look, this running total never grows beyond some fixed ceiling CC.

The surprising answer, found by Terence Tao in 2015, is no: however cleverly the sequence is chosen, some choice of skip dd and length nn will always eventually blow the total past any ceiling you name.

sup⁡n,d∈N∣∑j=1nf(jd)∣=∞,f:N→{−1,+1}\sup_{n,d \in \mathbb{N}} \left| \sum_{j=1}^{n} f(jd) \right| = \infty, \qquad f:\mathbb{N}\to\{-1,+1\}
Detailed analysis

For a function f:N→{−1,+1}f:\mathbb{N}\to\{-1,+1\}, define its discrepancy as sup⁡n,d∈N∣∑j=1nf(jd)∣\sup_{n,d\in\mathbb{N}}\left|\sum_{j=1}^n f(jd)\right|, the largest possible absolute value of a partial sum of ff restricted to a homogeneous arithmetic progression d,2d,…,ndd,2d,\ldots,nd. Paul Erdős conjectured in the 1930s that this discrepancy is always infinite, i.e. for every ff and every constant CC, some n,dn,d make ∣∑j=1nf(jd)∣>C\left|\sum_{j=1}^n f(jd)\right| > C.

The problem resisted proof for over 80 years and became the subject of the 2010 Polymath5 collaborative project (initiated by Timothy Gowers), which established several partial results and equivalent reformulations but not the full conjecture. Terence Tao proved the full result in 2015 (published in Discrete Analysis, 2016), and in fact for the more general vector-valued statement where ff takes values in the unit sphere of any real or complex Hilbert space, not just {−1,+1}\{-1,+1\}.

The rest of this proof follows Tao's three-part strategy stated in his paper's abstract: a Fourier-analytic reduction (from the Polymath5 project) to completely multiplicative functions, a logarithmically averaged form of the Elliott conjecture on correlations (Tao's own separate 2015 result), and a final argument (extending an idea also from Polymath5) that rules out the one remaining case.

Terms in this step
Homogeneous arithmetic progression
A list of multiples of a fixed number dd: d,2d,3d,…,ndd,2d,3d,\ldots,nd; "homogeneous" here means the progression starts at dd itself rather than at an arbitrary offset.
Knowledge used in this step