MathLabs

Open problem, Analysis, Geometry, posed 1917

Kakeya conjecture

Partially solved

Every Besicovitch (or Kakeya) set K⊆RnK \subseteq \mathbb{R}^n—that is, a Borel set containing a unit line segment in every direction e∈Sn−1e \in S^{n-1}—has Hausdorff dimension and Minkowski dimension equal to nn: dim⁡H(K)=dim⁡M(K)=n\dim_H(K) = \dim_M(K) = n.

Research frontier as of 2026

As of 2026, the Kakeya conjecture is proved for n=2n = 2 (Davies, 1971) and resolved in a landmark 127-page February 2025 preprint by Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl (`arXiv:2502.17655`) for n=3n = 3, proving dim⁡H(K)=dim⁡M(K)=3\dim_H(K) = \dim_M(K) = 3 for every Kakeya set in R3\mathbb{R}^3. Wang and Zahl combined their earlier proof of the sticky Kakeya conjecture (`arXiv:2210.09581`) with multiscale volume estimates for unions of δ\delta-tubes packed inside convex sets. For all dimensions n≥4n \ge 4, both the Hausdorff and Minkowski Kakeya conjectures remain open, as does the stronger Kakeya maximal function conjecture in L3(R3)L^3(\mathbb{R}^3) and higher.

Best known results

  • In R3\mathbb{R}^3, every Kakeya set has Hausdorff and Minkowski dimension 33 (Hong Wang and Joshua Zahl, 2025 preprint `arXiv:2502.17655`).
  • In R4\mathbb{R}^4, planebrush and polynomial-partitioning methods give dim⁡H(K)≥3.059\dim_H(K) \ge 3.059 (Katz and Zahl, 2021).
  • In general dimension Rn\mathbb{R}^n, arithmetic Kakeya reductions of Katz and Tao (2002) give dim⁡H(K)≥(2−2)(n−4)+3\dim_H(K) \ge (2 - \sqrt{2})(n - 4) + 3.

Tools and where they stop

ToolAchievedWhere it stops
Multiscale tube-packing and sticky Kakeya analysisRules out hypothetical lower-dimensional configurations of δ\delta-tubes in R3\mathbb{R}^3 by reducing general tube packings to sticky/convex-grain cases and establishing sharp volume bounds (Wang–Zahl, 2025).In Rn\mathbb{R}^n for n≥4n \ge 4, tubes can concentrate inside intermediate-dimensional algebraic subvarieties of dimension 2,…,n−22, \dots, n-2, creating much more complex incidence hierarchies.
Polynomial method and decoupling (Dvir, Guth, Bourgain–Demeter)Completely solves the finite-field Kakeya problem in Fqn\mathbb{F}_q^n (Dvir, 2009) and proves sharp ℓ2\ell^2 decoupling inequalities and multilinear Kakeya estimates in Rn\mathbb{R}^n.In Euclidean space, δ\delta-tubes have thickness δ>0\delta > 0 and can intersect at small angles in semi-algebraic neighborhoods where polynomial vanishing arguments lose degree efficiency.

Open questions

  • Does every Kakeya set in Rn\mathbb{R}^n for n≥4n \ge 4 have Hausdorff and Minkowski dimension equal to nn?
  • Can the Wang–Zahl three-dimensional Kakeya theorem be upgraded to the full L3(R3)L^3(\mathbb{R}^3) Kakeya maximal function bound and the full three-dimensional Fourier restriction conjecture?

Proofs

  1. The planar case: every Kakeya set in R2\mathbb{R}^2 has dimension 2 (Davies, 1971)Roy O. Davies (theorem); standard proof exposition after A. Córdoba, 1971Difficulty 3/5ResearchCondensed summary
  2. The three-dimensional case: every Kakeya set in R3\mathbb{R}^3 has dimension 3 (Wang–Zahl, 2025)Hong Wang, Joshua Zahl, 2025Difficulty 5/5ResearchCondensed summary

References

  1. Hong Wang, Joshua Zahl (2025). Volume estimates for unions of convex sets, and the Kakeya set conjecture in three dimensions · arXiv:2502.17655 [preprint, not peer-reviewed]
  2. Thomas Wolff (1999). An algorithmic approach to the Kakeya problem · DOI:10.1090/ulect/029/10
  3. Zeev Dvir (2009). On the size of Kakeya sets in finite fields · DOI:10.1090/S0894-0347-08-00607-3