Worked solution: The three-dimensional case: every Kakeya set in $\mathbb{R}^3$ has dimension 3 (Wang–Zahl, 2025)
Discretize: let be tubes of dimensions in , pointing in -separated directions. Write for the statement that their union always has volume . A single tube trivially gives ; a classical 1970s argument of Córdoba (the same idea behind the planar Kakeya theorem) gives ; Wolff's 1995 'hairbrush' argument gives , and progress stalled there for three decades despite deep work by Bourgain, Katz, Tao, and others. Wang and Zahl's new preprint proves for every , which is exactly the statement that every Kakeya set in has Hausdorff and Minkowski dimension .
Wang and Zahl's paper (2502.17655, §1) states the main theorem as this volume bound for arbitrary tube families satisfying the 'Katz–Tao convex Wolff axioms' (a technical generalization of plain direction-separation needed to make the induction close). Terence Tao's expository blog post on the paper explains that the proof strategy is induction on scales: assume the bound holds at every scale for tube families of every size, and try to bootstrap it into for some small ; iterating finitely many times then drives up to for every .
- Induction on scales
- A proof strategy, pioneered by Bourgain and Wolff, that tries to bootstrap for some small by regrouping thin tubes into fat ones at an intermediate scale, applying the hypothesis at both the coarse and fine scale, and combining the results.