MathLabs

Worked solution: A rainbow-tree proof of Ringel's conjecture (2020)

Step 8 of 8: Closing the loop: Ringel's conjecture holds for large nn
In plain words

With Theorem 2.1 established, the very first idea from Step 2 -- Kotzig's cyclic-shift trick -- finishes the whole proof in one line: take the guaranteed rainbow copy of TT, spin it around the 2n+12n+1 positions of the circle, and the 2n+12n+1 rotated copies automatically use every edge of K2n+1K_{2n+1} exactly once. What began as an old, elegant conjecture about trees and complete graphs is settled by combining a purely combinatorial colouring trick with heavy modern machinery (randomised embeddings and absorption) built to guarantee that one essential rainbow copy always exists.

K2n+1 decomposes into 2n+1 edge-disjoint copies of any tree T with n edgesK_{2n+1} \text{ decomposes into } 2n+1 \text{ edge-disjoint copies of any tree } T \text{ with } n \text{ edges}
Detailed analysis

Combining Theorem 2.1 (Step 7) with Kotzig's cyclic-shift observation (Step 2): for sufficiently large nn, the ND-coloured K2n+1K_{2n+1} contains a rainbow copy T^\hat{T} of any given nn-edge tree TT, and its 2n+12n+1 cyclic shifts T^0,…,T^2n\hat{T}_0,\ldots,\hat{T}_{2n} are pairwise edge-disjoint (since a shift only maps edges to other edges of the same colour, and T^\hat{T} uses each colour once) and together cover all n(2n+1)n(2n+1) edges of K2n+1K_{2n+1}. This proves Theorem 1.2: K2n+1K_{2n+1} decomposes into 2n+12n+1 copies of TT for every sufficiently large nn, confirming Ringel's 1963 conjecture; the same argument simultaneously proves Kotzig's related conjecture about rainbow copies in the ND-colouring, and gives the first decomposition result for complete graphs into arbitrary-degree spanning-scale subgraphs, free of the bounded-degree restriction that limited all earlier approaches.

Knowledge used in this step