Worked solution: Potential automorphy of symmetric powers proves the Sato–Tate conjecture (2011)
Knowing that becomes automorphic after moving to a larger number field is not quite the same as knowing the good analytic behavior over itself — but a standard bookkeeping trick, comparing the -function over with the one over via all the intermediate fields, transfers the good behavior down.
Once this descent is carried out, every symmetric power -function is shown to have exactly the holomorphic continuation and non-vanishing on that Serre's criterion from Step 2 demanded.
By Step 6, for every non-CM and every , the representation restricted to some totally real field is automorphic, so over enjoys the holomorphic continuation and non-vanishing on guaranteed by Step 3's general automorphic theory.
A standard argument (automorphic induction, or comparing Artin-type factorizations of Dedekind zeta functions of the tower of fields between and ) shows the -function over divides the one over in a suitable sense, and — using that the quotient is itself a product of automorphic -functions with known non-vanishing on — the same holomorphic continuation and non-vanishing descend to over itself, for every .
This is precisely the analytic hypothesis Serre's criterion (Step 2) required, now established unconditionally for every non-CM elliptic curve .
- automorphic induction
- A standard technique in the Langlands program for transferring automorphic -functions between a field and a smaller field it contains (or its subfields), used here to move the analytic properties of from back down to .