Worked solution: Euler's degree argument (1736)
Picture tracing the tour with a pencil, never lifting it and never crossing the same bridge twice. Every time the pencil arrives at a landmass partway through the trip, it must also leave again — one bridge brought it in, a different bridge takes it back out. So every 'pass-through' visit uses up exactly two of that landmass's bridges, one in and one out, like a zipper pairing them off two by two.
Only the very first landmass (where the pencil starts, with one departure that has no matching arrival) and the very last one (where it stops, with one arrival that has no matching departure) can be left with a single bridge unpaired — unless the tour starts and ends at the same landmass, in which case even that one gets paired completely.
Suppose a walk crosses every edge of the graph exactly once. Fix a vertex and look at every time the walk visits in the middle of the trip (that is, is neither the very first nor the very last vertex of that particular visit). Each such visit uses one edge to arrive at and a different edge to leave again, and because the walk never repeats an edge, no edge at is ever reused across different visits.
This pairs off the edges at into (arrival, departure) pairs, two at a time, for every visit that is not the overall start or overall finish of the walk. If is never the start or finish, all of its edges get paired this way, so must be even. If is the start (and not also the finish), one departure edge is left with no matching arrival, so is odd; symmetrically, if is only the finish, one arrival edge is left unmatched. If is both the start and the finish (a closed tour), the leftover departure and the leftover arrival pair with each other, and is even again.
Because a single walk has exactly one starting vertex and exactly one finishing vertex — possibly the same one — this pairing argument shows directly that at most two vertices of the graph can end up with odd degree, and if the walk is closed, none do. This is the actual mechanism behind Euler's rule, not just a fact to take on faith.